You say you don't lie, but then you lie in your next post.

Post #81,790 by Brandioch 2/14/03 8:57:16 PM Reply	You say you don't lie, but then you lie in your next post. Fascinating. you are the one that both claims sadaam has chem and bio weapons and denies they exist at the same time. Once again, the pro-war faction has to resort to lies in an attempt to distract from the shallowness of their position. No, I have never said that Saddam did not possess chemical agents. What I said was that he did not have sufficient quantity of such to pose a significant threat to even his neighboring nations. The same with biological weapons. He doesn't have enough to do more than annoy an enemy. Because you seem to be operating under a number of handicaps (low IQ and immaturity), I will put this in VERY SIMPLE TERMS. If I have a gun and 6 bullets. I have a weapon. I am armed. I am capable of killing SIX people. I am NOT a threat to Kuwait's government nor Kuwait's army nor Kuwait's civilian populace. I'm sure Saddam HAS chemical agents. I am also sure that Saddam DOES NOT have SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES of such to do any significant damage. "Significant damage" in this context means "more damage than his conventional weapons would do". Which is why even the nations sharing a border with Iraq are NOT afraid of an attack from Saddam. But feel free to keep posting your lies. If that's the only way you can feel better about the defeat of your pro-war position.
Post #81,797 by boxley 2/14/03 9:14:38 PM Reply	read your own post No, I have never said that Saddam did not possess chemical agents. now lets review another post of yours [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=81412\|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=81412] We're going to invade WITHOUT finding ANY TRACE of "Weapons of Mass Destruction so you keep insisting to have your cake and drink it too. Any normal person not obsessed with winning an argument at all costs would aknowledge that the above statements are at odds with each other and were used by you in a pathetic attempt to win an argument to the point of obsession. obsess away thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] "France," he noted, "has neither winter nor summer, nor morals. Apart from these drawbacks, it is a fine country." Mark Twain
Post #81,809 by Brandioch 2/14/03 9:47:22 PM Reply	Ummm, did you say "read"? And then you quote me saying: We're going to invade WITHOUT finding ANY TRACE of "Weapons of Mass Destruction Hmmmm, I guess you missed the bit about "WITHOUT finding ANY TRACE of "Weapons of Mass Destruction". Which seems rather strange as you did specifically quote it. so you keep insisting to have your cake and drink it too. Any normal person not obsessed with winning an argument at all costs would aknowledge that the above statements are at odds with each other and were used by you in a pathetic attempt to win an argument to the point of obsession. Awwww, does it hurt you? So sorry. But without FINDING them.... It cannot be PROVEN that they exist. If it cannot be PROVEN, then you're going to go in and kill kids based upon your BELIEFS. Hey, al Queda's looking for people like you. I said I do BELIEVE that Saddam has chemical agents, but that he doesn't have enough to pose any threat (more of a threat than conventional weapons) to anyone. But I am NOT one who would support the killing of a child WITHOUT having my belief SUBSTANTIATED by PHYSICAL EVIDENCE. Hey, it's an EASY requirement to fulfill. And our current regime keeps claiming that it has information that would, if given to the inspectors, allow my requirement to be fulfilled. Awww, does it hurt when you learn that your government has been telling fibs to you? I'm sure they were just little "white" lies. Really, I'm sure they were. And now you have to try to lie about what I posted. But my posts haven't been altered. I believe that Saddam does not have enough chemical agents to pose a threat and that is why the inspectors have not been able to find any chemical weapons. Why does the pro-war faction have to keep resorting to lies? Because their position is shallow and has been demolished.
Post #81,816 by boxley 2/14/03 9:59:08 PM Reply	Obsess away poster boy So define evidence. So far Blix has reported Rockets that are not supposed to be in Iraq is not evidence Mustard gas destroyed by inspectors, not evidence ammo designed for chem warfare, not evidence I guess you are waiting for those items to kill a lot of americans first, for your evidence. Or will you then portray that as not being evidence. hmmm, obsess away. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] "France," he noted, "has neither winter nor summer, nor morals. Apart from these drawbacks, it is a fine country." Mark Twain
Post #81,820 by Brandioch 2/14/03 10:16:01 PM Reply	That's sweet. :) I guess you are waiting for those items to kill a lot of americans first, for your evidence. You forgot to post your picture of dead kids with the claim that I support it. :) Marlowe, give Boxley back his keyboard.
Post #81,821 by boxley 2/14/03 10:18:05 PM Reply	damn knew there was something I forgot to link :) will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] questions, help? [link\|mailto:pappas@catholic.org\|email pappas at catholic.org] "France," he noted, "has neither winter nor summer, nor morals. Apart from these drawbacks, it is a fine country." Mark Twain

Welcome to IWETHEY!