IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 1 active user | 1 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New depends on the payload doesnt it?
lots of non nuke bio/chem stuff will be as nasty as fallout and less likely to destroy mosques.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New You're wrong, again.
lots of non nuke bio/chem stuff will be as nasty as fallout and less likely to destroy mosques.
Well, if you consider only the irradiated dust particles, then you'd be correct.

But what about the explosion?

The initial radiation burst that turns people into shadows?

depends on the payload doesnt it?
But that wasn't your original statement. The SCUD is the "delivery vehicle". Yes, he has SCUD's. No, he does not have nukes (or, there has been no evidence found that he has nukes despite the best efforts of the USofA).
New wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden?
edit shitty memory, didnt look it up first.
sorry mr atom doesnt always win. Check yer field manual.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Expand Edited by boxley Feb. 11, 2003, 02:31:20 PM EST
New That's why we measure in "kilo-tons" and "mega-tons".
wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden?


Stop.

Okay.

Now, type in that you believe that Saddam will put an equivalent tonnage of conventional explosives on Israel as we put on Dresden.

Go ahead.

You're slipping from a discussion of Iraq's capability
-to-
A theoretical discussion on conventional vs nuclear weapons.

Don't do that.

Do you think that Saddam will put an equivalent tonnage of conventional explosives on Israel as we put on Dresden?

And, as far as I know, the death count was HIGHER for Hiroshima than for Dresden (calculate in radiation induced cancer and such).
     For the folks that think Israel is pushing the Iraq conflict - (boxley) - (15)
         So what are we supposed to conclude ? - (dmarker) - (10)
             This is suh-weet! - (Brandioch) - (9)
                 how many Iraqi Scuds were shot at Israel 1991? - (boxley) - (5)
                     SCUD's != Nukes - (Brandioch) - (4)
                         depends on the payload doesnt it? - (boxley) - (3)
                             You're wrong, again. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                 wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden? - (boxley) - (1)
                                     That's why we measure in "kilo-tons" and "mega-tons". - (Brandioch)
                 Luv ya - you really have a way with words <g> ... - (dmarker) - (2)
                     I am pro war but for different reasons than others - (boxley) - (1)
                         Are Kuwait and Israel still there? - (Brandioch)
         Who are those folks? - (Silverlock) - (3)
             ZOG -NT - (boxley)
             People right here - (bluke) - (1)
                 I love this. - (a6l6e6x)

She's kinda got that "tornado bait before the DingDongs work their magic" look.
105 ms