IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New This is suh-weet!
A growing number of U.S. military intelligence analysts believe Hussein has at least limited nuclear capabilities.

"When he is certain his time has come," said one, "he will launch his doomsday weapon. He wants to go down in history as the man who destroyed Israel."
I don't think this even makes it up to "opinion".

I read more as "fantasy".

"Duck hunters accidentally shoot angel in Arkansas!"
New how many Iraqi Scuds were shot at Israel 1991?
how many will he send this time knowing that Bush wants him at the end of a rope. (shrug) wear a gasmask if you are travelling to Israel anytime soon. Someone who has taken a shot at you before and threatens to do it again you dont ignore.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New SCUD's != Nukes
Newsflash for you. This was talking about Nukes and a "doomsday weapon".

A difference of a couple magnitudes there (just in case you didn't know it).

Someone who has taken a shot at you before and threatens to do it again you dont ignore.
Oh, I'm sure he'd like to lob some more SCUD's at Israel.

I'm just as sure that this will NOT have anywhere NEAR the effect of dropping one nuke on Israel.
New depends on the payload doesnt it?
lots of non nuke bio/chem stuff will be as nasty as fallout and less likely to destroy mosques.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New You're wrong, again.
lots of non nuke bio/chem stuff will be as nasty as fallout and less likely to destroy mosques.
Well, if you consider only the irradiated dust particles, then you'd be correct.

But what about the explosion?

The initial radiation burst that turns people into shadows?

depends on the payload doesnt it?
But that wasn't your original statement. The SCUD is the "delivery vehicle". Yes, he has SCUD's. No, he does not have nukes (or, there has been no evidence found that he has nukes despite the best efforts of the USofA).
New wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden?
edit shitty memory, didnt look it up first.
sorry mr atom doesnt always win. Check yer field manual.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
Expand Edited by boxley Feb. 11, 2003, 02:31:20 PM EST
New That's why we measure in "kilo-tons" and "mega-tons".
wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden?


Stop.

Okay.

Now, type in that you believe that Saddam will put an equivalent tonnage of conventional explosives on Israel as we put on Dresden.

Go ahead.

You're slipping from a discussion of Iraq's capability
-to-
A theoretical discussion on conventional vs nuclear weapons.

Don't do that.

Do you think that Saddam will put an equivalent tonnage of conventional explosives on Israel as we put on Dresden?

And, as far as I know, the death count was HIGHER for Hiroshima than for Dresden (calculate in radiation induced cancer and such).
New Luv ya - you really have a way with words <g> ...
"Duck hunters accidentally shoot angel in Arkansas!"

Boxley - please read & try to grasp !!!

Cheers Doug
(Box, take this as a compliment from me, that I believe you are one of the few PRO-War's here who will actually try to think (excl 'Screamer' who does think but has already sold his soul to history <v b grin>))
New I am pro war but for different reasons than others
be that as it may. Iraq attacked 2 countries in 1991. Kuwait and Israel. Sadaam has threated the destruction of Israel many times. If we go in it is his last chance to make good his boast before he dies. You and Brandioch poo poo away Saddams words and prior actions. Interesting on what constitutes your thought process. If it is anti sadaam, even if sadaam himself says it, it must be lie.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

questions, help? [link|mailto:pappas@catholic.org|email pappas at catholic.org]
New Are Kuwait and Israel still there?
What was the long term effect on Israel?

Zero?

Hmmmm......

You and Brandioch poo poo away Saddams words and prior actions.
Nope. We just EVALUATE his prior actions whereas YOU seem to be caught up in the FANTASY.

What did he ACCOMPLISH before? Was Israel destroyed?

50% destroyed?

25% destroyed?

10% destroyed?

5% destroyed?

1% destroyed?

Less?

And NOW his military is EVEN WEAKER.

So his capability for destruction is GREATER?!?

I don't give a fuck WHAT HE SAYS HE WILL DO.

If we go in it is his last chance to make good his boast before he dies.
But if he doesn't have the CAPABILITY, then he will NOT be able to do it.

And he does NOT have the capability.

Sadaam has threated the destruction of Israel many times.
And Israel is still there.

Because TALK IS CHEAP!

He doesn't have the CAPABILITY to fulfill his statements.

If it is anti sadaam, even if sadaam himself says it, it must be lie.
If it is contrary to the facts, no matter who says it, it is still contrary to the facts.

If the US invades.....

Saddam will NOT launch a nuke at Israel.....

Not because he has SAID he would not.....

Not because he would not LIKE to.....

But because he does NOT HAVE A NUKE TO LAUNCH.

His attacks, if any, on Israel will be ineffective and of short duration.
     For the folks that think Israel is pushing the Iraq conflict - (boxley) - (15)
         So what are we supposed to conclude ? - (dmarker) - (10)
             This is suh-weet! - (Brandioch) - (9)
                 how many Iraqi Scuds were shot at Israel 1991? - (boxley) - (5)
                     SCUD's != Nukes - (Brandioch) - (4)
                         depends on the payload doesnt it? - (boxley) - (3)
                             You're wrong, again. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                                 wanna tell me who had more casualties? Hiroshima or Dresden? - (boxley) - (1)
                                     That's why we measure in "kilo-tons" and "mega-tons". - (Brandioch)
                 Luv ya - you really have a way with words <g> ... - (dmarker) - (2)
                     I am pro war but for different reasons than others - (boxley) - (1)
                         Are Kuwait and Israel still there? - (Brandioch)
         Who are those folks? - (Silverlock) - (3)
             ZOG -NT - (boxley)
             People right here - (bluke) - (1)
                 I love this. - (a6l6e6x)

What's the point of being heavily armed if you can't be impulsive? I mean, really...
324 ms