XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan) - (40) - Feb. 3, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST
         Re: XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 10:56:37 AM EST
         just for grins - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:03:37 AM EST
             No dice. Same spew. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:25 AM EST
         Post the puke. -NT - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:04:46 AM EST
             First link in initial post. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:28:44 AM EST
                 Whoops, missed that. - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:32:22 AM EST
                     Haven't got a clue. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:05 AM EST
         OT did you sic Brandi onto - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:41:34 AM EST
             Just googled the link. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:46:34 AM EST
             seagoth? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:09:37 PM EST
                 thought you might like it -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:26:00 PM EST
         Radeon 9000 not supported yet? - (admin) - (27) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:56:43 AM EST
             Yes - (Steve Lowe) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:05:02 PM EST
             So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (25) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:21:40 PM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (18) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:01:36 PM EST
                     Ditto. - (admin) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:14:47 PM EST
                     Well, that's part of the problem. - (inthane-chan) - (16) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:18:23 PM EST
                         Re: Well, that's part of the problem. - (rickmoen) - (15) - Feb. 3, 2003, 02:08:40 PM EST
                             Might look into that. - (inthane-chan) - (10) - Feb. 3, 2003, 02:15:32 PM EST
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (deSitter) - (6) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:02:28 PM EST
                                     No. - (pwhysall) - (5) - Feb. 4, 2003, 07:33:08 AM EST
                                         Not worth responding to. RTFRN -NT - (deSitter) - (4) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:29:39 AM EST
                                             Heh. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:06:44 AM EST
                                                 Now I'm pissed - (deSitter) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:25:06 AM EST
                                                     Re: Now I'm pissed - (pwhysall) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:30:20 AM EST
                                                     Pissed, maybe, but still wrong. - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:14:32 AM EST
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (rickmoen) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:14:21 AM EST
                                     Thanks! - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:43:57 AM EST
                                         Dooo eeet - (pwhysall) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:59:05 AM EST
                             Not so sure about that. - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:57:05 PM EST
                                 Re: Not so sure about that. - (rickmoen) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:28:46 AM EST
                                     One thing I have always maintained: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:18:28 AM EST
                             Gracias - (Ashton) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:30:20 AM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:17:47 PM EST
                     Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:40:35 AM EST
                         Resolving dependancies. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:47:26 AM EST
                             Re: Resolving dependancies. - (rickmoen) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:02:50 AM EST
                                 My preferred kernel-building technique: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:09:28 AM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:42:00 AM EST
         Depth 1? - (deSitter) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:16:12 PM EST