IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Linux Forum / Now I'm pissed
Post #79,151
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
2/4/03 9:25:06 AM
Reply
New Now I'm pissed
Read it your fucking self, white man.

Have YOU ever calculated your own timings? Have YOU ever modified a FB console to work on obscure hardware? Have you? No?

Shut the fuck up and stick to your janitorial duties.

[link|http://www.xfree.org/4.0.1/index.html|http://www.xfree.org/4.0.1/index.html]

Rage 128 - "Supported."

He posted his startup info. It clearly states that the driver loaded, all the extensions loaded including GLX, but no valid "screens" were found so it quit. That means the combination of refresh rates and the DPMS info his monitor was sending to the card could not be matched up.


-drl
Post #79,155
by pwhysall
Picture of pwhysall
2/4/03 9:30:20 AM
Reply
New Re: Now I'm pissed
Read it your fucking self, white man.

Ooh, ain't you the big man.
Have YOU ever calculated your own timings? Have YOU ever modified a FB console to work on obscure hardware? Have you? No?

Yes, and no.
Shut the fuck up and stick to your janitorial duties.

How's about you stop being wrong?
[link|http://www.xfree.org/4.0.1/index.html|http://www.xfree.org/4.0.1/index.html]

Rage 128 - "Supported."

This is, of course the driver that doesn't detect or use the Rage 128 TF in this here GX240, but hey. Let's not let facts cloud our righteous anger.
He posted his startup info. It clearly states that the driver loaded, all the extensions loaded including GLX, but no valid "screens" were found so it quit. That means the combination of refresh rates and the DPMS info his monitor was sending to the card could not be matched up.

...and it didn't detect his card.

You're still wrong. Get over yourself.

Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
Post #79,168
by admin
Picture of admin
2/4/03 10:14:32 AM
Reply
New Pissed, maybe, but still wrong.
He has a RADEON 9000. Not a RAGE 128.

The driver initialized, then quite plainly informed everyone reading the trace (but you) that it couldn't. find. the. card. Read it again until this becomes plain (hint: it's the part that says "(EE) No devices detected."). Or do like I did and google for "radeon 9000 linux" and read a bit. Learn some. Be amazed at your Grand Unifying Lack of Cluefulness.

Amazingly enough, after he installed 4.2.1 the driver found his card! Alack-a-day! NOW his spew says "(EE) Unable to find a valid framebuffer device.
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration." which is indicative of 1) possible kernel support needed (as Greg noted) and 2) a misconfiguration, in stark contrast to the previous error on 4.1. Amazing how that works.

All your bluster about what you have and haven't done doesn't mean a thing when you're wrong.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
     XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan) - (40) - Feb. 3, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST
         Re: XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 10:56:37 AM EST
         just for grins - (boxley) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:03:37 AM EST
             No dice. Same spew. -NT - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:25 AM EST
         Post the puke. -NT - (admin) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:04:46 AM EST
             First link in initial post. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:28:44 AM EST
                 Whoops, missed that. - (admin) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:32:22 AM EST
                     Haven't got a clue. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:05 AM EST
         OT did you sic Brandi onto - (boxley) - (3) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:41:34 AM EST
             Just googled the link. - (inthane-chan) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:46:34 AM EST
             seagoth? - (Brandioch) - (1) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:09:37 PM EST
                 thought you might like it -NT - (boxley) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:26:00 PM EST
         Radeon 9000 not supported yet? - (admin) - (27) - Feb. 3, 2003, 11:56:43 AM EST
             Yes - (Steve Lowe) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:05:02 PM EST
             So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (25) - Feb. 3, 2003, 12:21:40 PM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (18) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:01:36 PM EST
                     Ditto. - (admin) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:14:47 PM EST
                     Well, that's part of the problem. - (inthane-chan) - (16) - Feb. 3, 2003, 01:18:23 PM EST
                         Re: Well, that's part of the problem. - (rickmoen) - (15) - Feb. 3, 2003, 02:08:40 PM EST
                             Might look into that. - (inthane-chan) - (10) - Feb. 3, 2003, 02:15:32 PM EST
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (deSitter) - (6) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:02:28 PM EST
                                     No. - (pwhysall) - (5) - Feb. 4, 2003, 07:33:08 AM EST
                                         Not worth responding to. RTFRN -NT - (deSitter) - (4) - Feb. 4, 2003, 08:29:39 AM EST
                                             Heh. - (pwhysall) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:06:44 AM EST
                                                 Now I'm pissed - (deSitter) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:25:06 AM EST
                                                     Re: Now I'm pissed - (pwhysall) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:30:20 AM EST
                                                     Pissed, maybe, but still wrong. - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:14:32 AM EST
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (rickmoen) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:14:21 AM EST
                                     Thanks! - (inthane-chan) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:43:57 AM EST
                                         Dooo eeet - (pwhysall) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:59:05 AM EST
                             Not so sure about that. - (admin) - (2) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:57:05 PM EST
                                 Re: Not so sure about that. - (rickmoen) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:28:46 AM EST
                                     One thing I have always maintained: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:18:28 AM EST
                             Gracias - (Ashton) - Feb. 4, 2003, 06:30:20 AM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (4) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:17:47 PM EST
                     Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (3) - Feb. 4, 2003, 09:40:35 AM EST
                         Resolving dependancies. - (inthane-chan) - (2) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:47:26 AM EST
                             Re: Resolving dependancies. - (rickmoen) - (1) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:02:50 AM EST
                                 My preferred kernel-building technique: - (admin) - Feb. 4, 2003, 11:09:28 AM EST
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - Feb. 4, 2003, 10:42:00 AM EST
         Depth 1? - (deSitter) - Feb. 3, 2003, 03:16:12 PM EST

File not found.
56 ms