IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Linux Forum
/
No dice. Same spew.
Post #78,932
by
inthane-chan
2/3/03 11:34:25 AM
Reply
No dice. Same spew.
XFree configuration help needed.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (40)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 10:54:40 AM EST
Re: XFree configuration help needed.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 10:56:37 AM EST
just for grins
- (
boxley
)
- (1)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:03:37 AM EST
No dice. Same spew.
-NT
- (
inthane-chan
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:25 AM EST
Post the puke.
-NT
- (
admin
)
- (3)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:04:46 AM EST
First link in initial post.
-NT
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (2)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:28:44 AM EST
Whoops, missed that.
- (
admin
)
- (1)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:32:22 AM EST
Haven't got a clue.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:34:05 AM EST
OT did you sic Brandi onto
- (
boxley
)
- (3)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:41:34 AM EST
Just googled the link.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:46:34 AM EST
seagoth?
- (
Brandioch
)
- (1)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:09:37 PM EST
thought you might like it
-NT
- (
boxley
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:26:00 PM EST
Radeon 9000 not supported yet?
- (
admin
)
- (27)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 11:56:43 AM EST
Yes
- (
Steve Lowe
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:05:02 PM EST
So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (25)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 12:21:40 PM EST
Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (18)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 01:01:36 PM EST
Ditto.
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 01:14:47 PM EST
Well, that's part of the problem.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (16)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 01:18:23 PM EST
Re: Well, that's part of the problem.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (15)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 02:08:40 PM EST
Might look into that.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (10)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 02:15:32 PM EST
Re: Might look into that.
- (
deSitter
)
- (6)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 03:02:28 PM EST
No.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (5)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 07:33:08 AM EST
Not worth responding to. RTFRN
-NT
- (
deSitter
)
- (4)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 08:29:39 AM EST
Heh.
- (
pwhysall
)
- (3)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:06:44 AM EST
Now I'm pissed
- (
deSitter
)
- (2)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:25:06 AM EST
Re: Now I'm pissed
- (
pwhysall
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:30:20 AM EST
Pissed, maybe, but still wrong.
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:14:32 AM EST
Re: Might look into that.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (2)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:14:21 AM EST
Thanks!
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (1)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:43:57 AM EST
Dooo eeet
- (
pwhysall
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:59:05 AM EST
Not so sure about that.
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 03:57:05 PM EST
Re: Not so sure about that.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (1)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:28:46 AM EST
One thing I have always maintained:
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:18:28 AM EST
Gracias
- (
Ashton
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 06:30:20 AM EST
Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (4)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 03:17:47 PM EST
Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (3)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 09:40:35 AM EST
Resolving dependancies.
- (
inthane-chan
)
- (2)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:47:26 AM EST
Re: Resolving dependancies.
- (
rickmoen
)
- (1)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 11:02:50 AM EST
My preferred kernel-building technique:
- (
admin
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 11:09:28 AM EST
Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version.
- (
rickmoen
)
- Feb. 4, 2003, 10:42:00 AM EST
Depth 1?
- (
deSitter
)
- Feb. 3, 2003, 03:16:12 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Son, when you've lived as long as I have, you'll want to forget most of it too.
47 ms