IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Post the puke.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New First link in initial post.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
New Whoops, missed that.
Well, the ATI driver isn't finding the card, apparently.

Do you have all the necessary kernel support compiled in? I know that my nVidia requires apgart support.
Regards,

-scott anderson

"Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."
New Haven't got a clue.
Remember, you're dealing with a completely clueless Linux n00b here...
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
     XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan) - (40)
         Re: XFree configuration help needed. - (inthane-chan)
         just for grins - (boxley) - (1)
             No dice. Same spew. -NT - (inthane-chan)
         Post the puke. -NT - (admin) - (3)
             First link in initial post. -NT - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                 Whoops, missed that. - (admin) - (1)
                     Haven't got a clue. - (inthane-chan)
         OT did you sic Brandi onto - (boxley) - (3)
             Just googled the link. - (inthane-chan)
             seagoth? - (Brandioch) - (1)
                 thought you might like it -NT - (boxley)
         Radeon 9000 not supported yet? - (admin) - (27)
             Yes - (Steve Lowe)
             So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (25)
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (18)
                     Ditto. - (admin)
                     Well, that's part of the problem. - (inthane-chan) - (16)
                         Re: Well, that's part of the problem. - (rickmoen) - (15)
                             Might look into that. - (inthane-chan) - (10)
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (deSitter) - (6)
                                     No. - (pwhysall) - (5)
                                         Not worth responding to. RTFRN -NT - (deSitter) - (4)
                                             Heh. - (pwhysall) - (3)
                                                 Now I'm pissed - (deSitter) - (2)
                                                     Re: Now I'm pissed - (pwhysall)
                                                     Pissed, maybe, but still wrong. - (admin)
                                 Re: Might look into that. - (rickmoen) - (2)
                                     Thanks! - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                                         Dooo eeet - (pwhysall)
                             Not so sure about that. - (admin) - (2)
                                 Re: Not so sure about that. - (rickmoen) - (1)
                                     One thing I have always maintained: - (admin)
                             Gracias - (Ashton)
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (inthane-chan) - (4)
                     Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen) - (3)
                         Resolving dependancies. - (inthane-chan) - (2)
                             Re: Resolving dependancies. - (rickmoen) - (1)
                                 My preferred kernel-building technique: - (admin)
                 Re: So looks like I need to bump my XF86 version. - (rickmoen)
         Depth 1? - (deSitter)

Consider the job: to build a structure based on live bone and meat that has to perform under extreme forces in one of the most corrosive environments on the planet. Has to look good too.
114 ms