The 'GNU' credit question - (rickmoen) - (33) - Jan. 16, 2003, 07:49:45 PM EST
         Nicely put. -NT - (admin) - (5) - Jan. 16, 2003, 08:10:01 PM EST
             Seconded -NT - (bepatient) - (4) - Jan. 16, 2003, 08:25:20 PM EST
                 Thirded. -NT - (folkert) - (3) - Jan. 16, 2003, 11:36:20 PM EST
                     GNU/Forth'd -NT - (kmself) - (2) - Jan. 17, 2003, 01:09:37 AM EST
                         gForth - very fast - not GNU/Forth -NT - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2003, 01:13:10 AM EST
                             Rick, when you shine is is dazzling - nice work !!! -NT - (dmarker) - Jan. 20, 2003, 08:49:18 PM EST
         Mine. - (Brandioch) - (1) - Jan. 16, 2003, 08:12:11 PM EST
             Re: Mine. - (rickmoen) - Jan. 16, 2003, 08:55:32 PM EST
         Re: The 'GNU' credit question - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 17, 2003, 12:09:59 AM EST
             Re: The 'GNU' credit question - (rickmoen) - Jan. 17, 2003, 12:51:28 AM EST
             Re: The 'GNU' credit question - (pwhysall) - (1) - Jan. 17, 2003, 03:19:08 AM EST
                 ln -s /dev/null /dev/stfu - ROFL -NT - (deSitter) - Jan. 17, 2003, 10:11:27 AM EST
         is linux linux sans gnu ? - (boxley) - Jan. 17, 2003, 12:55:56 AM EST
         That last answer is a corker! :-) -NT - (static) - Jan. 17, 2003, 06:10:33 AM EST
         I open mine big fat mouth and say unto the world: - (cwbrenn) - (18) - Jan. 31, 2003, 03:04:04 PM EST
             Re: I open mine big fat mouth and say unto the world: - (rickmoen) - (14) - Jan. 31, 2003, 06:42:41 PM EST
                 Re: I open mine big fat mouth and say unto the world: - (cwbrenn) - (11) - Jan. 31, 2003, 05:35:43 PM EST
                     Re: I open mine big fat mouth and say unto the world: - (rickmoen) - (10) - Jan. 31, 2003, 06:26:08 PM EST
                         but... - (cwbrenn) - (9) - Jan. 31, 2003, 07:15:05 PM EST
                             Re: but... - (rickmoen) - (8) - Feb. 1, 2003, 02:10:07 AM EST
                                 I don't see it as an ethical issue. Sorry. - (cwbrenn) - (7) - Feb. 1, 2003, 09:32:07 AM EST
                                     So, "ethics" = the *letter* of the law (or license), to you? -NT - (CRConrad) - (3) - Feb. 1, 2003, 06:38:59 PM EST
                                         Yes, when the REASON for the license is ETHICAL - (cwbrenn) - (2) - Feb. 1, 2003, 08:21:57 PM EST
                                             Freaky definition of ethics, AFAICS. -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2003, 05:24:45 PM EST
                                                 Very well. -NT - (cwbrenn) - Feb. 2, 2003, 11:16:14 PM EST
                                     Re: I don't see it as an ethical issue. Sorry. - (rickmoen) - (2) - Feb. 2, 2003, 02:20:46 AM EST
                                         ??? - (cwbrenn) - (1) - Feb. 2, 2003, 11:56:35 AM EST
                                             ??? - (rickmoen) - Feb. 2, 2003, 12:09:56 PM EST
                 oh yeah... - (cwbrenn) - (1) - Jan. 31, 2003, 05:36:42 PM EST
                     Re: oh yeah... - (rickmoen) - Jan. 31, 2003, 06:41:11 PM EST
             Re: I open mine big fat mouth and say unto the world: - (deSitter) - Feb. 1, 2003, 02:30:46 AM EST
             Why I say GNU/Linux - (kmself) - (1) - Feb. 1, 2003, 04:50:25 AM EST
                 I'll give Stallman a lot - (cwbrenn) - Feb. 1, 2003, 09:40:14 AM EST