IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I think the opposite has been claimed.
unless called on it then you exit stage right ad nauseum.
I will hammer a point until the thread has right shifted beyond readability.

I do NOT leave a discussion.

There is no difference between targeting a building full of civilians with a plane or with a cruise missile.

No difference.

The only difference between killing with a missile and stomping their heads beneath your boots is whether you can see their faces and their eyes.

You're trying to salve your emotions by distancing yourself from the actual killing so you can PRETEND that they weren't kids just like you see every day. So you can PRETEND that they were faceless "collateral damage".

They are PEOPLE.
Not THINGS.
New When did I ever argue otherwise?
Killing kids is killing kids
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New Here's a link that you might have forgotten about.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78095|I want to you post that.]

Yet you would NOT post that. Hmmmm.

When did I ever argue otherwise?
Through this entire thread.

Killing kids is killing kids
Not accourding to your posts in this thread.

If it were so, then you wouldn't have any problem stomping baby skulls.

To quote you AGAIN:
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78188|One is murder, the other is killing.]

We are getting ready to murder children in a country that has NOT attacked us nor our allies.

We are WRONG.
New we are getting ready to kill kids and you are wrong
I asked you for a link and you submit a petty gotcha wanting everything your way. Sorry, I came here for an argument based on exchange of information and ideas. You came here to impose your emotions on everyone else.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New Awww, does it hurt when you're shown to be wrong?
When you are the agressor, it doesn't matter whether you use planes or missiles or whether you crush their skulls under your boots.

You are killing innocent civilians AND you are wrong.

We aren't DRUNK, we aren't ACCIDENTALLY launching those missiles and we are NOT pursuing OTHER courses that would NOT kill innocent civilians.

Sorry, I came here for an argument based on exchange of information and ideas.
Those are the FACTS.

If you have a problem with them, that is your problem.

The same way people here feel about a plane hitting the WTC
-is-
The same way people there will feel about a cruise missile hitting their home.
New No need to apologise or capitulate,
you refuse to accept that a dead kid is a dead kid. So make noise if you wish but present it a little better will ya?
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New I do neither. And you've shifted your position.
you refuse to accept that a dead kid is a dead kid.
Nice try. You lose. I have never stated that a dead kid is anything other than a dead kid.

My point has always been about the KILLING of the child.

Flying a plane into a building and killing children
-is no different than-
Sending a cruise missile into a building and killing children
-which is no different than-
Crushing the child's skull beneath your boot

You claimed that they were.

The only difference is whether you can see their faces and their eyes when they die.

You make me sick.
New puke away, you just shifted YOUR position
My point has always been about the KILLING of the child.
no it wasnt a few threads back you were calling it murder I WAS CALLING IT KILLING. Nice reversal Sid.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New Cute. But I can post references to your posts.
In context.

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78441|you refuse to accept that a dead kid is a dead kid.]

compared with

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78188|One is murder, the other is killing.]

no it wasnt a few threads back you were calling it murder I WAS CALLING IT KILLING. Nice reversal Sid.
Hmmm, you are probably refering to [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78292|this post].

Hmmmm, it seems that YOU are the one attempting to claim that it is "killing" when done by our side, but "murder" when done by their side.

I am still consistent that there is no difference between what the terrorists did and what we are planning to do.

But now you claim that I am making such a distinction?

I guess that's why you couldn't post a reference and I could.

Flying a plane into a building and killing children
-is no different than-
Sending a cruise missile into a building and killing children
-which is no different than-
Crushing the child's skull beneath your boot
New I did post a reference to that and you ignored it
bob and weave all you want to I am right you are wrong.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New Make all the claims you want to. The proof is delivery.
Awwwww, I'm really sure that you said that. I really am. Really.

[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=78464|This is a link]

Unfortunately for you, I have no problem posting links to previous posts that reference your ORIGINAL position.

Now I'm sure that you can post a link to an EARLIER post from you that contradicts that.

I'm sure you can.

You just don't have the time or something, right?
New Oh Christ, the magic man returns!! self referencing proves!
You select several links of YOURS to claim I am making points. lets continue in that vein. I will post a link to your post where you claim killing kids is murder.
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=77829|http://z.iwethey.org...w?contentid=77829]
Flying a plane into a building and killing children
-is no different than-
Sending a cruise missile into a building and killing children
-which is no different than-
Crushing the child's skull beneath your boot
One is murder, the next killing the third murder.
Hijacking planes flying them into buildings
[link|http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00001.htm|http://www.usdoj.gov...tle9/crm00001.htm] murder
the catholic view of the difference between murder and killing
In this hypothesis it is, at most, permitted on account of a reason commensurate with so great an evil as is the destruction of human life. Thus, for instance, a military commander may train his guns upon a fortified place, even though in the bombardment which follows he knows perfectly well that many non-combatants will perish. The sufficient cause in the case is consideration of the highest public good to be subserved by the defeat of the enemy.

finally the authoritive source that you as good soldier schwenke in this case must recognise as an authority
[link|http://www.carlisle.army.mil/usawc/Parameters/02spring/butler.htm|http://www.carlisle....spring/butler.htm]

the following is the source of most of your material
[link|http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/jeffrey/www/loons/conspiracy/tyler.html|http://www-2.cs.cmu....piracy/tyler.html]
neeners,
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

"The Mafia was preferable to the state, because it survived by providing services people actually wanted"
Murray Rothbard
New Careful, you'll wake the Merlin - Paris, France.
     Neither peace nor justice - the truth about the protestors - (marlowe) - (56)
         That's what you civilians don't understand. - (Brandioch) - (54)
             They also don't understand warlordism. - (tseliot) - (53)
                 Target "the people?" - (marlowe) - (52)
                     I forgot about the M16 the little vietnamese girl carried - (boxley) - (48)
                         I'm claiming there will be no more civilian casualties... - (marlowe) - (47)
                             Dont mistake me for a non warring party - (boxley) - (45)
                                 Big difference when you're on invasion rather than defense. - (Brandioch)
                                 Dead babies in the streets is a price... - (marlowe) - (43)
                                     This is what is called a "principle". - (Brandioch) - (42)
                                         sorry 2. Im for going in also -NT - (boxley) - (41)
                                             I want to you post that. - (Brandioch) - (40)
                                                 nice try - (boxley) - (39)
                                                     A generation that doesn't understand death. - (Brandioch) - (38)
                                                         Paying what price - (boxley) - (37)
                                                             F***ing cop out Bill - (dmarker) - (1)
                                                                 what copout? You believe that kicking a baby to death - (boxley)
                                                             "One is murder, the other is killing." - (Brandioch) - (34)
                                                                 Lost cause here Brandi - he just doesn't get it ... - (dmarker) - (3)
                                                                     How far away from a War is - far enough? (new thread) - (Ashton)
                                                                     Nice try no cigar - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                         WTF? - (Brandioch)
                                                                 when was the last time the US was invaded - (boxley) - (29)
                                                                     NATO. Our allies. - (Brandioch) - (28)
                                                                         kettle pot, puke away - (boxley) - (27)
                                                                             Wow, a 100% content free post. - (Brandioch) - (26)
                                                                                 the priciple of qickly sidetepping valid points? - (boxley) - (13)
                                                                                     I think the opposite has been claimed. - (Brandioch) - (12)
                                                                                         When did I ever argue otherwise? - (boxley) - (11)
                                                                                             Here's a link that you might have forgotten about. - (Brandioch) - (10)
                                                                                                 we are getting ready to kill kids and you are wrong - (boxley) - (9)
                                                                                                     Awww, does it hurt when you're shown to be wrong? - (Brandioch) - (8)
                                                                                                         No need to apologise or capitulate, - (boxley) - (7)
                                                                                                             I do neither. And you've shifted your position. - (Brandioch) - (6)
                                                                                                                 puke away, you just shifted YOUR position - (boxley) - (5)
                                                                                                                     Cute. But I can post references to your posts. - (Brandioch) - (4)
                                                                                                                         I did post a reference to that and you ignored it - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                             Make all the claims you want to. The proof is delivery. - (Brandioch)
                                                                                                                         Oh Christ, the magic man returns!! self referencing proves! - (boxley) - (1)
                                                                                                                             Careful, you'll wake the Merlin - Paris, France. -NT - (Another Scott)
                                                                                 Information isn't perfect. - (Another Scott) - (11)
                                                                                     Check the rhetoric on that one. - (Brandioch) - (10)
                                                                                         I'll try one more time.... - (Another Scott) - (1)
                                                                                             Don't bother trying to confuse the issue. - (Brandioch)
                                                                                         We're not firing at a city - (Arkadiy) - (7)
                                                                                             Re: We're not firing at a city - (TTC) - (6)
                                                                                                 try this one for context - (boxley)
                                                                                                 If Saddam has half a brain, - (Arkadiy) - (4)
                                                                                                     Re: If Saddam has half a brain, - (TTC) - (3)
                                                                                                         We're firing at very specific building in a city - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                                                                                                             Heard a lengthy analysis yesterday of our 'Tactical Plan' - (Ashton) - (1)
                                                                                                                 Maybe caution will prevail - (Arkadiy)
                             Hey, in 150 years, they'll all be dead anyway. - (Brandioch)
                     Already been stated. - (Brandioch) - (2)
                         Is it possible for some of us to - (dmarker) - (1)
                             :) - (Brandioch)
         The exactsame dissembling occurred re Vietnam demonstrations - (Ashton)

Don't forget, I was present at an unexplained mass sea sponge migration!
92 ms