
Off in your delusion again?
I've already addressed the question of al Qaeda in Iraq, though it does serve your agenda to pretend otherwise.
You have claimed that Iraq has ties to al Queda.
Your failure to answer - or even to acknowledge - this amounts to an admission that they really aren't going to be able to withstand us outdoors, any better than they did in Afghanistan, not even if Saddam gives them VX canisters.
Please try to maintain at least some connection to Reality.
If Saddam had VX, why would he NOT give it to people to use against us when we invade?
(For the benefit of onlookers, I reiterate and expand: As before, we'll be moving too fast for them. They won't be able to find our troop concentrations while they're still concentrated. They won't be able to find our base camps before they've moved on. They'll be lucky to take out the patrols that are taking them out. Also, no caves this time, and no backstabbing French, ergo no Shar-i-Kot repeat.)
Again, chemical weapons are used to deny avenues of approach and to channelize enemy forces.
All Saddam has to do is to hand out those cannisters (how many TONS did you say were unaccounted for) to the people you say are linked to him and they go out and wait along the routes.
We won't be moving "too fast" when the cloud is directly in front of our troops.
Hell, for all we know you could be fantasizing about having been in the Army, pathetic as such a fantasy would be.
Maybe. But I've provided units and dates.
I have no need to hide my past.
You are the one who is trying to pretend she is someone she is not.
I've been through live agent training at Ft. McClellan.
I've done battlefield simulations with smoke.
You? You have your Sgt. Rock comics and your fantasies.