Nope - one, the numbering system, is...
...but the other, the *measurement* system, is all about being based on simple naturally-occuring quantities, *inter-related* to each other.
Like, the definition of the meter (length) being based on the size of the Earth(*); the definition of the liter (volume) being based on the meter(+); the definition of the kilogram (weight) being based on the liter($), and so on and on.
The fact that the units *within* each realm then are sub-divided in whole powers of ten is incidental, chosen just because it's the most convenient when the numbering system we use -- but the main thing is, it makes for nice clean transitions *between* the realms.
As opposed to, say, "What's the mass-equivalent of the kinetic energy of one pint of lard, travelling at one million furlongs per fortnight", where you have a zillion weird and ARBITRARY unit-conversion factors to perform along the calculation.
Do you *finally* get the frigging difference, now?!?
Oh, well... Didn't think so. :-(
(*): Originally defined as one ten-millionth of the distance from the equator to the poles.
(+): The size -- volume -- of a cube with sides one-tenth of a meter.
($): The weight -- uh, sorry, mass -- of one liter of water.
[link|mailto:MyUserId@MyISP.CountryCode|Christian R. Conrad]
(I live in Finland, and my e-mail in-box is at the Saunalahti company.)
Your lies are of Microsoftian Scale and boring to boot. Your 'depression' may be the closest you ever come to recognizing truth: you have no 'inferiority complex', you are inferior - and something inside you recognizes this. - [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=71575|Ashton Brown]