IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New I see a lot of PCs and a lot of disks.
As you know.

Worst disks? Maxtor. No question. I RMA more of these than any other.

Next up, IBM DeskStar drives, and Fujitsu. I don't care how good Fujitsu drives are - their stupid warranty arrangement (which makes it extremely difficult to RMA a drive) means that I hate them.

Seagate and WD are on a par for reliability, and also oddly enough for having the most straightforward RMA procedure.

For SCSI disks, I'm currently seeing low failure rates on Quantum Atlas and Seagate Cheetah disks. The IBM SCSI disks are just as crap as their IDE ones.

Interestingly enough, a lot of the big disk manufacturers are, at least for IDE drives, dropping their warranty periods to 1 year. WD aren't doing this. I guess I'm buying WD at home next time.


Peter
[link|http://www.debian.org|Shill For Hire]
[link|http://www.kuro5hin.org|There is no K5 Cabal]
[link|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org|Blog]
New Fujitsu RMA problem.
I hear that was a European situation. I had no RMA problems at all with them here in the U.S. under their "no questions warranty".

As for Western Digital warranty, take it from them:
Western Digital has adopted a new warranty policy effective October 1, 2002. Western Digital WD Caviar Special Edition hard drives are covered under warranty for a three-year period. All other Western Digital products will be covered under a standard warranty for a period of one year. Products purchased before October 1, 2002 are covered under the product's original warranty, unless otherwise noted on the retail packaging.
Maxtor created the three year warranty, and they were the first to bite the bullet and rescind it. Everyone else followed in both cases.

Certain distributors in certain countries are "enhancing" the one year warranty, but it's the distributor's warranty, not the drive maker's.

[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
     I *heart* IBM Hardware - (deSitter) - (30)
         You *heart* Hitachi Global Data Storage - (tonytib) - (11)
             Astounding, No? - (deSitter) - (1)
                 I must admit - (orion)
             And have no recollection of 20 MB CMI drives used in PC-AT.. - (a6l6e6x) - (8)
                 Full hearted devices, took up a whole drive bay - (orion)
                 Remember that well - (deSitter) - (6)
                     For the record. - (inthane-chan) - (1)
                         The First Mac - (orion)
                     Slim pickings on CMI drive, but here's some: - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
                         Re: Slim pickings on CMI drive, but here's some: - (deSitter) - (2)
                             First ATs were shipped in 1984. So you may... - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                 You could hear.. - (deSitter)
         Re: I *heart* IBM Hardware - (admin) - (17)
             Can't possibly be based in reality - (deSitter) - (16)
                 Guess you never had a 75GXP - (admin) - (6)
                     Wow - one got through - (deSitter) - (3)
                         Actually it was two. - (admin)
                         Actually, IIRC the problem was glass platters - (tonytib) - (1)
                             Re: Actually, IIRC the problem was glass platters - (deSitter)
                     I've got a 60 GB 75GXP at work. - (Another Scott) - (1)
                         About 8 hours.. - (deSitter)
                 My experience with Seagate & IBM 3.5 in drives is that ... - (dmarker) - (8)
                     You mean Hitachi, right? - (Andrew Grygus) - (7)
                         I see a lot of PCs and a lot of disks. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                             Fujitsu RMA problem. - (Andrew Grygus)
                         Re: You mean Hitachi, right? - (deSitter) - (4)
                             Re: You mean Hitachi, right? - No!! Fujitsu 2.5 in drive - (dmarker) - (1)
                                 fujitsu has better shock rating... - (bepatient)
                             Seagate == Enterprise - (broomberg) - (1)
                                 No, they still make low end drives - (tonytib)

We've got a whole bag of *tsht* with your name on it!
80 ms