IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New The CPU speed is a multiple of your memory bus speed.
I think you're very close to resolving your problems.

:-)

Processor speed -

The "Autodetect" bios settings (which I try to stick to, because I'm not interested in overclocking) gives me a choice for processor speed: 1250mHz or 1667mHz. Why is this, exactly? The 2000 + processor doesn't actually run at 2000mHz, I know that much, but I'm not sure which of those is the proper setting. I do know that currently if I set it to 1667 the computer reboots endlessly, so 1250 is the "workable" one.

Bus speed -

The bus speed defaults to 133 when the cpu is set to 1667, and 100 when set to 1250. I have no idea why, since when the Athlon 1000 was installed it was always at 133. I don't have one of those new 266 boards, and I don't have any of that super-RAM either, but I do have RAM that runs at 133. Why would the board scale back to 100, ever?


At 1000 MHz, your system is running 133 MHz x 7.5, so it's not having to be driven as hard as when it's trying to run faster. Memory timing issues between the CPU and memory aren't quite as critical in the slower case.

Your system is giving you choices of 1250 MHz (12.5 x 100 MHz) or 1667 MHz (12.5 times 133 MHz) with the 2000+ processor. For your 2000+ (1667 MHz) processor to run at 1667 MHz, it has to run at 12.5 times the 133 MHz memory clock. If it won't run there, it means that there's some memory timing issue or something similar. Sometimes these issues can be resolved by tweaking the CPU voltage, but that'll make it run hotter. I've never done such tweaking.

Since only the 12.5 x 100 MHz version is working, it seems to be saying that your memory won't run at 133 MHz (at least on this board with this CPU at the moment). You could try using SpeedFan (mentioned earlier) to slowly tweak your memory clock and see if you can squeeze a little more speed out of it. On my Abit 1000 MHz Athlon system, I have choices of 100, 101.5, 103, 105, 107.5, 110, 112, 115, 117.5, etc. Note that increasing these frequencies also increases your PCI bus speed, so it may affect the stability of your peripherals as well.

I rechecked your motherboard specs and it does use PC133 RAM rather than DDR. It does seem a little risky to me, though, to try to run such a fast processor with relatively slow memory like that, but others have reported success.

[link|http://www.active-hardware.com/english/reviews/mainboard/a7v.htm|This] review of your board talks about various jumpers and ways of tweaking things in the BIOS. You might want to glance at that, if you haven't done so.

Bottom line: I think it's the RAM or RAM settings.

Good luck!

Cheers,
Scott.
New I used to have some problems like this.
Until I realized it was always with an Asus board, so I don't use Asus boards any more and don't have these problems (currently using Shuttle - same board, no problems from 900-MHz Duron to Athlon 2000+). Built about 40 machines this year with AK11, AK12 and AK32.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New Succient and to the point...
AS always...

[link|mailto:curley95@attbi.com|greg] - Grand-Master Artist in IT
[link|http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry/|REMEMBER ED CURRY!]   [link|http://pascal.rockford.com:8888/SSK@kQMsmc74S0Tw3KHQiRQmDem0gAIPAgM/edcurry/1//|ED'S GHOST SPEAKS!]
Heimatland Geheime Staatspolizei reminds:
These [link|http://www.whitehouse.gov/pcipb/cyberstrategy-draft.html|Civilian General Orders], please memorize them.
"Questions" will be asked at safety checkpoints.
New I'm looking into GigaByte myself.
Mainly because I currently have a GigaByte board that currently runs an overclocked Slot A 650 (can only get it to 715 because anything higher and it won't even POST) and it's been working flawlessly since Day One.

My current fascination is an older [link|http://www.giga-byte.com/products/7vrxp.htm|GA-7VRXP] and possibly an XP 2000+. Yes, the board is a bit dated, but a) I don't want Bleeding Edge, b) the onboard NIC and sound have a prayer of working with OS/2 Warp 4, and c) the prices for it are coming down as vendors are unloading excess inventory that hasn't sold.
New I have used a few GigaByte without problems
If I remember correctly, for dual processor units, though I think at least one was a single processor.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
New I have one of those
I've got an GA-7VRXP in my older system and the nice bleeding edge GA-7VAXP in my new one. I got the GA-7VAXP because the GA-7VRXP worked so well I just went with the latest model in that line.

The GA-7VRXP worked like a charm, the only tweaking I ever had to do was with the memory setting. I had to up the voltage one step on both systems to get my 333Mhz CL2 memory to work stably.

I had my 2200+xp running in the GA-7VRXP for a while, and it worked fine.

Jay
New Why risky?
When you say a memory problem, do you mean that my memory has probably gone bad, or that it's just not fast enough for the processor?

So I guess to fix my problem what I need to do is go out and buy a new motherboard with a 266 bus and some of that new-fangled DDR Ram...

Not that I'd mind, I'm just a bit short on cash right now.
"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?"
- Edward Young
New While I'm on the subject...
if I'm going out to buy this new motherboard and ram, should I get a bigger power supply? Maybe go on up to 500? I don't know what the minimum is supposed to be anymore...

"We are all born originals -- why is it so many of us die copies?"
- Edward Young
New I don't think your parts are "bad" - they just interact as
if they are. The RAM (what brand and specs, BTW?) may be fine on another machine. In [link|http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1303&p=3|Anandtech's review of this board] they recommend Corsair or Muskin memory. Newegg.com has a 512 MB stick of PC133 Corsair CL-2.5 memory for $67. I've been happy with my Soyo K7V Dragon+ using Crucial memory. Newegg's cheapest Soyo board is $78. 512 MB of Crucial DDR for it would be $128.

If you don't have money to burn, *don't* buy anything. Just use what you've got but tweak it until it's reliable (even if you have to run it slightly slowly). Things will always be faster and cheaper in the future. :-)

You shouldn't need more than 300 W for your system. 500 W is overkill unless you've got lots of PCI cards (e.g. SCSI cards) and lots of hard drives.

According to [link|http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24309.pdf|this], your 2000+ dissipates a maximum power of 70 W (maximum chip temperature of 90 C). It draws a maximum of 40 A at 1.75 V (35.7 A typical). [link|http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/26003.pdf|This] AMD paper gives you pointers on how to calculate how big a PS you need. 300 W should be plenty if it's an ATX12V supply.

HTH.

Cheers,
Scott.
(Who thinks his 1.2 GHz Athlon home system is plenty fast enough right now...)
     Various questions about my CPU and BIOS - (cwbrenn) - (14)
         The CPU speed is a multiple of your memory bus speed. - (Another Scott) - (8)
             I used to have some problems like this. - (Andrew Grygus) - (4)
                 Succient and to the point... - (folkert)
                 I'm looking into GigaByte myself. - (n3jja) - (2)
                     I have used a few GigaByte without problems - (Andrew Grygus)
                     I have one of those - (JayMehaffey)
             Why risky? - (cwbrenn) - (2)
                 While I'm on the subject... - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                     I don't think your parts are "bad" - they just interact as - (Another Scott)
         Voltages et al. - (static) - (1)
             1.75 V. See 1st AMD .PDF link in "I don't think ..." above. -NT - (Another Scott)
         Various Answers - (JayMehaffey) - (2)
             family.model.step 6.4.2 - (cwbrenn) - (1)
                 whoops, ran report on wrong processor :P - (cwbrenn)

Your entire eulogy was just your bartender telling a coroner, "Yeah, I think that's Britney."
61 ms