IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: I wondered how people in here would come down on it...
If the Tampa hadn't picked them up, we would have another 400+ illegal aliens to do something with. They were definitely coming to Australian soil.

Perhaps I was confused, then. I was under the impression they sank going from somewhere to Indonesia.

We deny lots of people entry before they get here. We've even turned whole boatloads away before. Why not this lot?

We're not leaving them out there to rot. We're giving them food, water and medical aid.

That's.. leaving them out there to rot. The medical care is arguable, but I don't know that its lacking.

If the owner of the ship wants to complain about us turning their cargo ship into a passenger ship, I'm sure we will have great delight in pointing this out.

So in other words, after being (directed to be) a Good Samaritan, its not Your Problem. Well, sometimes things *become* a problem.

It's a Norwegian ship. They are a victim of circumstance. If it was a Dutch ship, or a Brazillian ship, or whatever, we'd have a different country involved.

I still don't see where that has anything to do with Norway, proper, unless you're saying they should sail 1/2 way around the world with people lashed to the deck and deliver them to Norway. Norway's not involved in this.

The captain was told not to enter Australian waters. He had no reason to enter Australian waters - he claimed the refugees threatened to jump overboard again if he did not.

You're skipping, slightly. AU directed him to a sinking ship, with far more people than he can expect to deal with. Now that he's in that situation, nobody will assist *him*.

Note, too, the duplicity of Indonesia. The failing boat they were picked up from was indisputably Indonesian. The Tampa's next port of call was in Indonesia.

I'll have to see what I can find out about the location of the sinking. So it was closer to Indonesia than Australia?

Yet Indonesia refuses to discuss the matter with Australia, and has put warships out to prevent the Tampa from docking. Why are we the big ogre? Indonesia must have some responsibility here and they are refusing all of it.

I can agree with that they should also be willing to take some - but right *now* the boat is off the AU shore.

I'd also comment on how the captain probably expected to get a more civilized, humanitarian response from Australia, rather than Indonesia, for the problem that HE now has.

So the next time a boat is sinking off the AU coast, and all the passing ships are having radio problems... what do you say to them, that they are monsters?

Addison
New Think of it as "we want to set our own immigration policy."
Perhaps I was confused, then. I was under the impression they sank going from somewhere to Indonesia.

Nah. Going from there to here.

    We're not leaving them out there to rot. We're giving them food, water and medical aid.


That's.. leaving them out there to rot. The medical care is arguable, but I don't know that its lacking.

If we told Willenius Wilhemson that they were their responsibility, that would be "leaving them there to rot".

    If the owner of the ship wants to complain about us turning their cargo ship into a passenger ship, I'm sure we will have great delight in pointing this out.


So in other words, after being (directed to be) a Good Samaritan, its not Your Problem. Well, sometimes things *become* a problem.

And this is how we're handling this one.

I still don't see where that has anything to do with Norway, proper, unless you're saying they should sail 1/2 way around the world with people lashed to the deck and deliver them to Norway. Norway's not involved in this.

I think Norway is only really involved because it's being treated as an issue of soveriegnty and the ship is registered as a Norwegian vessel.

    The captain was told not to enter Australian waters. He had no reason to enter Australian waters - he claimed the refugees threatened to jump overboard again if he did not.


You're skipping, slightly. AU directed him to a sinking ship, with far more people than he can expect to deal with. Now that he's in that situation, nobody will assist *him*.

I shall have to find out about whether we really directed him to pick them up. In all likelihood, we probably expected him to take them to Indonesia, where he was going anyway.

I'll have to see what I can find out about the location of the sinking. So it was closer to Indonesia than Australia?

I don't know. Possibly. It was definitely in International waters.

    Yet Indonesia refuses to discuss the matter with Australia, and has put warships out to prevent the Tampa from docking. Why are we the big ogre? Indonesia must have some responsibility here and they are refusing all of it.


I can agree with that they should also be willing to take some - but right *now* the boat is off the AU shore.

... after we told the captain not to come! :-) What should we do now? Arrest him for disobeying? Could be interesting...

I'd also comment on how the captain probably expected to get a more civilized, humanitarian response from Australia, rather than Indonesia, for the problem that HE now has.

That's why I don't understand why we aren't involving the country these people are coming from.

So the next time a boat is sinking off the AU coast, and all the passing ships are having radio problems... what do you say to them, that they are monsters?

I can't answer that. Certainly it creates a "cry wolf" situation.

Wade.

"All around me are nothing but fakes
Come with me on the biggest fake of all!"

New "snarky" so does Israel (sorry couldnt resist)
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
     Australia boards, takes over refugee boat to prevent docking - (addison) - (13)
         Another story, photo of deck, it gets worse. - (addison) - (12)
             I wonder. - (static) - (11)
                 Running from the Taliban has to be similar enough to - (Ashton) - (1)
                     Come visit some time. - (static)
                 Re: I wonder. - (addison) - (8)
                     I wondered how people in here would come down on it... - (static) - (7)
                         Re: I wondered how people in here would come down on it... - (addison) - (2)
                             Think of it as "we want to set our own immigration policy." - (static) - (1)
                                 "snarky" so does Israel (sorry couldnt resist) -NT - (boxley)
                         simple yer turn in the barrel - (boxley) - (3)
                             Hmm. Some links. - (static) - (2)
                                 Coincidentally, the first quote - - (Ashton) - (1)
                                     Like I said at the outset... - (static)

Even the hydrocoptic marzelvane came up with a null...
44 ms