IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / what he said
Post #73,519
by boxley
1/8/03 8:54:28 PM
Reply
New what he said
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
     Determining platform type/OS in gcc via #defines - (admin) - (25) - Jan. 8, 2003, 07:48:54 PM EST
         Maybe Mozilla source would help... - (Another Scott) - (1) - Jan. 8, 2003, 08:26:13 PM EST
             Yes, this is the sort of thing I was looking for: - (admin) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:34:57 PM EST
         Is this on Linux? - (deSitter) - (8) - Jan. 8, 2003, 08:35:32 PM EST
             what he said -NT - (boxley) - Jan. 8, 2003, 08:54:28 PM EST
             I wasn't clear enough. - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:33:28 PM EST
                 Gotta be a #pragma right? - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:59:56 PM EST
                     #define -NT - (admin) - Jan. 8, 2003, 10:03:15 PM EST
                 /usr/include/machine/cpu.h (like that?) -NT - (boxley) - (3) - Jan. 8, 2003, 11:17:19 PM EST
                     Doesn't exist on this box. - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 8, 2003, 11:21:24 PM EST
                         osx has 3 entries - (boxley) - (1) - Jan. 8, 2003, 11:27:50 PM EST
                             Heh. No /usr/include/i386 either. - (admin) - Jan. 8, 2003, 11:39:26 PM EST
         I don't really have an answer handy... - (ChrisR) - (13) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:24:43 PM EST
             Compile time, without passing -D switches. -NT - (admin) - (12) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:35:48 PM EST
                 If memory serves me correct... - (ChrisR) - (11) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:41:52 PM EST
                     Right. But I don't want to pass -D switches. :-) - (admin) - (10) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:53:26 PM EST
                         Could autoconf help? - (static) - (9) - Jan. 9, 2003, 04:14:56 AM EST
                             We have our own build system; autoconf not a part of it -NT - (admin) - (8) - Jan. 9, 2003, 08:19:36 AM EST
                                 Autoconf could still be useful - (neelk) - (7) - Jan. 9, 2003, 01:24:15 PM EST
                                     Autoconf does so at runtime. - (admin) - (6) - Jan. 9, 2003, 01:34:45 PM EST
                                         Are we talking about "configure" script? - (Arkadiy) - (5) - Jan. 9, 2003, 03:42:14 PM EST
                                             You misunderstand me. - (admin) - (4) - Jan. 9, 2003, 03:46:40 PM EST
                                                 One man's compile time... - (ChrisR) - (3) - Jan. 9, 2003, 04:04:20 PM EST
                                                     I already do that; I don't want to. :-) - (admin) - (2) - Jan. 9, 2003, 04:38:25 PM EST
                                                         So what you're really wanting is... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Jan. 9, 2003, 04:46:21 PM EST
                                                             s/wanting/using - (admin) - Jan. 9, 2003, 05:01:51 PM EST

iwethey.org
Push stick forward -- houses get bigger; pull stick back -- houses get smaller!
108 ms