IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Open Forum / A question for you
Post #72,891
by lincoln
1/6/03 10:29:09 AM
Reply
New A question for you


If you're serious about a worldwide union, I would answer that professional certification ( Oracle, MCSE, MCDBA, DB2 certification, etc.) is about the only way you'll get any kind of "worldwide professional association".



As I asked the IWETHEY community this [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=68466|question], I've been looking into getting a certification in something not directly related to programming, such as a DBA position. Can you give me pointers on how to prepare and get a MSDBA, for example?

While programming to a certain extent is moving offshore, companies are less eager to move the data that the business needs outside of their glass rooms (for now).
lincoln
"Four score and seven years ago, I had a better sig"
Post #72,896
by orion
Picture of orion
1/6/03 10:37:08 AM
Reply
New Visit this website
[link|http://www.transcender.com|http://www.transcender.com]

You can buy software that will help you get ready for the Microsoft and other certification classes. They have one on MCDBA, I believe. Or just get the one on SQL Server and then get the MSDE 2000 server to run it for free for testing out the database and queries.
For an Alternative Nearly To Imitate IWETHEY please visit [link|http://pub75.ezboard.com/bantiiwethey|the ANTIIWETHEY Board]
providing an alternative to IWETHEY since December 2002
     H-1B Reform / IT Union - (JayMehaffey) - (80) - Jan. 3, 2003, 05:13:50 PM EST
         should be IBEW INHO that would handle retirement - (boxley) - Jan. 3, 2003, 05:28:03 PM EST
         Good point about nervousness of real AFL/CIO motives. - (a6l6e6x) - Jan. 3, 2003, 05:44:35 PM EST
         Why? Labor is labor. -NT - (deSitter) - (31) - Jan. 3, 2003, 10:22:40 PM EST
             Why what? - (JayMehaffey) - (30) - Jan. 3, 2003, 11:04:42 PM EST
                 Better a bad union, than no union at all. - (orion) - (29) - Jan. 3, 2003, 11:11:56 PM EST
                     imnsho, no union is a good union. -NT - (jbrabeck) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2003, 07:01:40 AM EST
                         Yup, let's go back to the days before unions. - (imric) - Jan. 4, 2003, 09:39:00 AM EST
                     Beg to differ. - (hnick) - (6) - Jan. 4, 2003, 09:21:10 AM EST
                         I did it myself - (orion) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2003, 01:43:13 PM EST
                             How about? - (gdaustin) - (4) - Jan. 5, 2003, 10:16:55 AM EST
                                 Yes I agree - (orion) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2003, 02:43:29 PM EST
                                     Dreamers.... - (gdaustin) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:26:23 PM EST
                                         A question for you - (lincoln) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:29:09 AM EST
                                             Visit this website - (orion) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:37:08 AM EST
                     My experiences with the Union - (bluke) - (19) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:14:24 AM EST
                         Duplicate post. @#$@#&% computer! -NT - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:20:24 AM EST
                         Similiar - (jbrabeck) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:19:40 AM EST
                         Was it at least all the same union? - (bbronson) - (5) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:31:10 AM EST
                             reminds me of the storey between the Raj - (boxley) - (4) - Jan. 5, 2003, 12:24:52 PM EST
                                 Henry Ford - (tuberculosis) - (3) - Jan. 7, 2003, 06:22:37 PM EST
                                     Fucking OF COURSE! - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 7, 2003, 07:45:56 PM EST
                                         Prisoners dilema - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Jan. 8, 2003, 03:44:00 AM EST
                                             Nice Exposition of PD - (deSitter) - Jan. 8, 2003, 11:21:35 AM EST
                         Good examples - (imric) - (10) - Jan. 5, 2003, 10:34:35 AM EST
                             Sanity at last - but.. - (deSitter) - (9) - Jan. 5, 2003, 11:42:55 AM EST
                                 Empty? - (imric) - (7) - Jan. 5, 2003, 01:02:50 PM EST
                                     Re: Empty? - (deSitter) - (6) - Jan. 5, 2003, 02:19:27 PM EST
                                         Here - (broomberg) - (4) - Jan. 5, 2003, 05:33:05 PM EST
                                             BAHAHAHA - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2003, 05:58:27 PM EST
                                                 Frog in the pot; works repeatedly via ego blindness - (Ashton) - (2) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:44:09 PM EST
                                                     Exactly - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:40:02 AM EST
                                                         'Shirking' not my point - (imric) - Jan. 6, 2003, 11:15:56 AM EST
                                         The problem is imagining that Unions - (imric) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:54:15 PM EST
                                 At what cost??? - (bluke) - Jan. 6, 2003, 03:28:01 AM EST
         All it means to me - (orion) - Jan. 3, 2003, 11:09:17 PM EST
         We beat this to death - (broomberg) - (11) - Jan. 4, 2003, 12:35:48 PM EST
             So? The issue keeps coming up - (deSitter) - (10) - Jan. 5, 2003, 11:44:36 AM EST
                 Nahh - (broomberg) - (9) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:01:29 PM EST
                     Right! - (deSitter) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:40:15 PM EST
                     Uh, I don't get this: - (CRConrad) - (7) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:43:13 PM EST
                         Yup - (broomberg) - (6) - Jan. 5, 2003, 07:32:06 PM EST
                             So you're assuming the second category doesn't need a union? -NT - (CRConrad) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2003, 07:36:08 PM EST
                                 Yup - (broomberg) - Jan. 5, 2003, 07:42:39 PM EST
                             Only if - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:20:55 PM EST
                                 But it's appropriate - (broomberg) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:41:30 PM EST
                             Yup - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:36:37 PM EST
                                 Try it - (broomberg) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:44:47 PM EST
         H1-B Problem Taking Care of Itself - (gdaustin) - (31) - Jan. 4, 2003, 01:16:26 PM EST
             Mostly cost pressure - (bluke) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:06:55 AM EST
             Wrong - (deSitter) - (21) - Jan. 5, 2003, 11:48:10 AM EST
                 Is that really your dream? - (Arkadiy) - (19) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:00:37 PM EST
                     A dream shared - (orion) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:04:24 PM EST
                     Re: Is that really your dream? - (deSitter) - (17) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:13:21 PM EST
                         Unions kill productivity in many ways - (bluke) - (15) - Jan. 6, 2003, 03:45:17 AM EST
                             Bad example - (broomberg) - (14) - Jan. 6, 2003, 06:38:21 AM EST
                                 Duplicate post - ignore -NT - (bluke) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:26:33 AM EST
                                     HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! sorry couldnt help it - (boxley) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:36:09 AM EST
                                 Not really ... - (bluke) - (11) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:18:12 AM EST
                                     But remember this - (orion) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:34:12 AM EST
                                     You have the heart of it. - (static) - Jan. 6, 2003, 05:48:25 PM EST
                                     Actually, there are ways around their rigid rules - (tonytib) - (8) - Jan. 6, 2003, 09:21:05 PM EST
                                         How about we split the difference - (orion) - (6) - Jan. 6, 2003, 09:41:39 PM EST
                                             Nice thought but unfeasible - (hnick) - (5) - Jan. 7, 2003, 07:29:51 AM EST
                                                 Re: Nice thought but unfeasible - (orion) - (4) - Jan. 8, 2003, 07:03:25 AM EST
                                                     Oh good, you mostly agree with me - (hnick) - (3) - Jan. 8, 2003, 07:45:22 AM EST
                                                         Vote with your feet? - (orion) - (2) - Jan. 8, 2003, 09:29:35 AM EST
                                                             Nothing is intolerable until you have a choice. - (hnick) - (1) - Jan. 9, 2003, 07:17:20 AM EST
                                                                 Re: Nothing is intolerable until you have a choice. - (orion) - Jan. 9, 2003, 09:23:59 AM EST
                                         Yes, the word Union blinds to - the possibilities in '02+ -NT - (Ashton) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:24:33 PM EST
                         Re: Is that really your dream? - (Arkadiy) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:37:22 AM EST
                 But, Greed is good... - (gdaustin) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:12:36 PM EST
             I disagree. A compromise needed - (tablizer) - (7) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:42:58 PM EST
                 Re: I disagree. A compromise needed - (gdaustin) - (5) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:26:59 PM EST
                     And what if they really can do the job ... - (bluke) - (3) - Jan. 6, 2003, 03:58:27 AM EST
                         One of the major development costs is communication overhead - (ben_tilly) - (2) - Jan. 6, 2003, 08:35:36 AM EST
                             Believe me I know ... - (bluke) - (1) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:22:27 AM EST
                                 Sounds like we are on the same page then - (ben_tilly) - Jan. 6, 2003, 02:47:59 PM EST
                     Corporate lying, not individuals - (tablizer) - Jan. 8, 2003, 02:27:44 AM EST
                 Your COBOL vs Java example is flawed - (broomberg) - Jan. 5, 2003, 08:36:30 PM EST
         interesting note on HB1 my interview is with a HB1 supplier - (boxley) - Jan. 5, 2003, 09:39:32 PM EST

Oh good, just go the wrong way why don't you!
165 ms