IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / News Picks Forum / We have a couple of those. Thanks.
Post #72,561
by Brandioch
1/4/03 7:32:47 PM
Reply
New We have a couple of those. Thanks.
We have Brother 1440's already. They do seem to be reliable.
Post #72,567
by deSitter
Picture of deSitter
1/4/03 8:04:17 PM
Reply
New Personally,
..I like the Lexmarks because they produce sharper text IMO - it's a very subjective thing. They don't seem as solidly built (unlike their inkjets, which are tanks). Still it's a company I'd be happy to do business with.
-drl
Post #72,883
by lincoln
1/6/03 10:14:30 AM
Reply
New Brother HL-1440
In yesterday's Sunday newspaper ad from Office Depot, this printer is undergoing a closeout sale. Price was $199.99 if I remember correctly.

Wife won't let me get one to replace my HP 4L printer still using the original toner cartridge (I don't print a whole lot now that resumes get emailed), but I sure do want one.
lincoln
"Four score and seven years ago, I had a better sig"
     Cringely's 2003 Predictions. - (Another Scott) - (25) - Jan. 4, 2003, 03:23:37 PM EST
         Re: Cringely's 2003 Predictions. - (deSitter) - (21) - Jan. 4, 2003, 03:42:34 PM EST
             What are your recommendations for personal laser printers? -NT - (Brandioch) - (10) - Jan. 4, 2003, 04:15:51 PM EST
                 Brother, Lexmark - (deSitter) - (9) - Jan. 4, 2003, 07:19:00 PM EST
                     they are ALL canon print engines arnt they? -NT - (boxley) - (5) - Jan. 4, 2003, 07:26:47 PM EST
                         Lexmark, I don't think so - (deSitter) - (4) - Jan. 4, 2003, 08:12:28 PM EST
                             No - (Andrew Grygus) - (3) - Jan. 4, 2003, 08:29:09 PM EST
                                 HP - (deSitter) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2003, 11:12:33 PM EST
                                     HP-65 - (Ashton) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2003, 12:48:02 AM EST
                                         Re: HP-65 - (deSitter) - Jan. 5, 2003, 02:11:04 AM EST
                     We have a couple of those. Thanks. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2003, 07:32:47 PM EST
                         Personally, - (deSitter) - Jan. 4, 2003, 08:04:17 PM EST
                         Brother HL-1440 - (lincoln) - Jan. 6, 2003, 10:14:30 AM EST
             Doesn't matter. - (Andrew Grygus) - (2) - Jan. 4, 2003, 08:17:23 PM EST
                 Re: Doesn't matter. - (deSitter) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2003, 10:47:08 PM EST
                     Dell has always sucked up to Microsoft and Intel . . - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:10:16 AM EST
             HP products are still good - (orion) - Jan. 5, 2003, 12:55:37 AM EST
             Re: Cringely's 2003 Predictions - (slugbug) - (5) - Jan. 5, 2003, 12:00:14 PM EST
                 I think that HP needs a change of CEO - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:35:30 PM EST
                     Complete Change of Attitude - (deSitter) - (3) - Jan. 5, 2003, 03:59:59 PM EST
                         Sudden change of market conditions. - (Andrew Grygus) - (1) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:14:49 PM EST
                             That's fascinating. - (static) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:58:11 PM EST
                         Hewlett-Packard and Compaq needed the merger. - (Andrew Grygus) - Jan. 5, 2003, 06:30:17 PM EST
         Re: Cringely's 2003 Predictions. - (JayMehaffey) - (1) - Jan. 4, 2003, 05:44:13 PM EST
             Intel was a core founding financial backer of RedHat - (dmarker) - Jan. 4, 2003, 08:05:30 PM EST
         Re: Cringely's 2003 Predictions. - (dmarker) - Jan. 4, 2003, 07:53:31 PM EST

I signed a contract that said so.
80 ms