Post #72,559
1/4/03 7:19:00 PM
|
Brother, Lexmark
The Brother series (e.g. HL-1440) take plain old SIMMs. They are solidly built, very compact, and fast. They produce beautiful output (Canon print engine) with excellent B&W graphics. The manual sheet feeder is rather aggressive and balks at thin paper, but is fine for envelopes and transparencies. This is the best personal laser I've seen.
-drl
|
Post #72,560
1/4/03 7:26:47 PM
|
they are ALL canon print engines arnt they?
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]
You think that you can trust the government to look after your rights? ask an Indian
|
Post #72,570
1/4/03 8:12:28 PM
|
Lexmark, I don't think so
I think they inherited their best hardware from the IBM days. For example, IIRC they were the first to make a laser with true 1200 dpi resolution.
-drl
|
Post #72,574
1/4/03 8:29:09 PM
|
No
Lexmark engines are not related to Canon in any way. They build their own.
The Lexmark Optra E was nearly impossible to service - a Chinese puzzle for sure, but they learned a lot, and the Optra 310/320 series is very easy to service. I haven't worked on their larger models because I haven's sold many.
I am highly prejudiced against Hewlett Packard, the only company that ever forced me to buy product on the gray market.
[link|http://www.aaxnet.com|AAx]
|
Post #72,593
1/4/03 11:12:33 PM
|
HP
It's just tragic - HP was the definition of well-made and innovative equipment. I have my old HP-71B right here, on the 10th or so set of 4AAA batteries since 1985 when I bought it. It has an amazingly accurate clock :) I wish I could find a pack of magnetic cards to record the shit that's been in there for decades. It's sort of funny, it will probably outlive me by no more than the life of a set of AAA batteries. Once I saw something small tumbling end over end in my M/C mirror - it was my 71B - fell off from operator error. Not a scratch on it, but it did ruin the finish of the original leather case, which was no longer shipping. That was a bummer. For some reason, I attached a Deadhead sticker to the extremely well used HP quick reference card, with the formula for LSD printed inside it.
It still amazes me that this little machine has a FORTH, a filesystem, an assembler, and a 4GL HP-BASIC, a nice one - all in 17k of (nibble-oriented, 34Knibs) RAM.
-drl
|
Post #72,610
1/5/03 12:48:02 AM
|
HP-65
I recall the day it came! Teeny mag cards (same as in 71 or were those larger?) Hmmm I might.. have a one or two about - mention if you want me to try to find. I think it had a Lunar Lander game, too. :-)
Leaving it on the desk running - as it looked for primes: think one was ~1 x 10E10 + 3? 4? People would come by, ask - how's it doing? But I believe the HP-35, the world's first scientific calculator, is the one which belongs in a glass case in the Library of Congress..
Yes that HP bears no remote resemblance to the current Billy-mold Pee Cee commodity hawkers of '02. HP == repackagers of tank-cars full of ink in 20\ufffd plastic pods to rip-off at $30, as long as the sheep will pay that.
As the US leaves the "commodity work" of science, techno - to overseas lo bidders, can [that Stupid Name] 'Agilent' long survive? making $30K digital scopes which are blind most of the sample-time, calculating. So who can afford $30-50K, except a few Corps trying to sell an even more expensive ink-jet refill (type thing), next?
My Hp 105A Quartz Oscillator (sec. time std., checked with a Rb std. periodically) has been ON here, for last 3+ years, probably 10 before that. It's crystal has aged to point of a predictable drift rate; improving on factory spec. I think.. this was still in HP catalog for $11K a few years ago, a vast sum even incl. inflation - compared to orig. pricing.
There's not One Item in Agilent catalog I could remotely afford to buy (well, maybe a spare probe clip).
Tektronix dismantled their world-class CRT-fab and much else, years ago - so they are basically in the digital-scope 'virtually-data' field too, while real engineers lovingly protect their 25+ yo fast scopes, for which there are NO replacements. (Save one Japanese Kikusui? 550 MHz scope using an image tube similar to Tek's now discontinued technology of yore - if that is still available)
So it ain't just HP - - it's the USA that has become Babbitt. A nation of marketing droids, from top to bottom.
Ashton
|
Post #72,623
1/5/03 2:11:04 AM
|
Re: HP-65
No, the 65 and 67 used unformatted cards - the card reader would draw the cards through at a fixed speed making formatting unnecessary. In contrast the 71B and 75 cards were preformatted, so they could be pulled by hand, saving the power expense of a motor. They were also much larger - about 10 inches long. They came in a long plastic tube.
-drl
|
Post #72,561
1/4/03 7:32:47 PM
|
We have a couple of those. Thanks.
We have Brother 1440's already. They do seem to be reliable.
|
Post #72,567
1/4/03 8:04:17 PM
|
Personally,
..I like the Lexmarks because they produce sharper text IMO - it's a very subjective thing. They don't seem as solidly built (unlike their inkjets, which are tanks). Still it's a company I'd be happy to do business with.
-drl
|
Post #72,883
1/6/03 10:14:30 AM
|
Brother HL-1440
In yesterday's Sunday newspaper ad from Office Depot, this printer is undergoing a closeout sale. Price was $199.99 if I remember correctly.
Wife won't let me get one to replace my HP 4L printer still using the original toner cartridge (I don't print a whole lot now that resumes get emailed), but I sure do want one.
lincoln "Four score and seven years ago, I had a better sig"
|