Or at least they paid more attention to MS biased sources.

especially funny is this quote from Dale Kutnick

"There's some from licensing, and there's a perception from some governments and countries that Microsoft is a monopoly. They want an alternative. Linux is gaining in popularity particularly in Asia, for example, where (companies) want more control of their destiny."

I thought it was proven in court that Microsoft is a monopoly! And worse than that an abusive monopoly.

But to get back to the point of the thread, if MS does port some of their server software onto Linux, I expect them to do a half assed job of it, and blame Linux for the problems.