IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Regional/World Conflict Forum / Once again.
Post #67,489
by Brandioch
12/9/02 10:29:34 AM
Reply
New Once again.
You have a bit of trouble with the definitions of words, don't you?

"on the brink"?

By that usage, just about every country in the world is "on the brink" of developing nukes. Sure, they don't have the material or the capability, but they have the notes.

Yet you're still unable to say when we're going to invade even after all your postings about how inspectors are finding violations in Iraq.

If any of your posts were genuine, Bush would have ordered the invasion.
Post #67,502
by Simon_Jester
12/9/02 10:54:12 AM
Reply
New Now wait a minute...
Iraq claims they're "on the brink".

But wasn't Marlowe the one showing us articles/evidence that showed Iraq was "on the brink" 5+ years ago?

Isn't this a "Duh"?
Post #67,531
by Brandioch
12/9/02 11:37:18 AM
Reply
New Perpetually, "on the brink".
I seem to recall him also posting about, oh, 6 months ago that Iraq was only 6 months away from a nuclear weapon.

And that we HAD to invade IMMEDIATELY or they'd develop one and use it on us.

But THIS TIME it's for sure that they're only 6 months away!

Now we REALLY have to invade IMMEDIATELY.
     Iraq admits on the brink of nuclear weapons - (marlowe) - (15) - Dec. 9, 2002, 09:00:18 AM EST
         Once again. - (Brandioch) - (2) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:29:34 AM EST
             Now wait a minute... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 9, 2002, 10:54:12 AM EST
                 Perpetually, "on the brink". - (Brandioch) - Dec. 9, 2002, 11:37:18 AM EST
         Then again, maybe not... - (Simon_Jester) - (11) - Dec. 1, 2003, 11:49:41 PM EST
             More of that "Cheyney Intelligence" - (jb4) - Dec. 2, 2003, 09:20:09 AM EST
             So we allegedly had several years... and no way of knowing. - (marlowe) - Dec. 2, 2003, 10:09:33 AM EST
             Re: Then again, maybe not... - (bepatient) - (8) - Dec. 2, 2003, 11:44:45 AM EST
                 Keep working it... - (Simon_Jester) - (7) - Dec. 2, 2003, 12:35:51 PM EST
                     Not quite... - (bepatient) - (6) - Dec. 2, 2003, 12:55:09 PM EST
                         Something not entirely clear - (jb4) - Dec. 2, 2003, 02:06:36 PM EST
                         Bzzt...sorry... - (Simon_Jester) - (4) - Dec. 2, 2003, 05:09:22 PM EST
                             I'm just extrapolating from what I saw here. - (bepatient) - (2) - Dec. 2, 2003, 05:41:52 PM EST
                                 Nyah...just goes to show... - (Simon_Jester) - (1) - Dec. 2, 2003, 06:01:09 PM EST
                                     More stuff - DIA claimed defector not reliable.... - (Simon_Jester) - Feb. 9, 2004, 07:20:32 PM EST
                             Interesting memo... - (Simon_Jester) - Dec. 8, 2003, 10:41:42 AM EST

Maybe this thing does have "macros".
42 ms