IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Re: Reimplementing the WPS
This is almost all true, but KDE is worthy because it proves that Qt and its "parts" are up to the task of hosting an environment - it also manages to exist in Windows with its threads and in X. Think of Qt as the PM level X interface for the port.

You don't need to port the code, you need to port the functionality.

What about the GNUStep environment? I know nothing. Would that be a hospitable place for WPS?

-drl
New GNUStep? Maybe
[link|http://www.gnustep.org/resources/documentation/manual_6.html|http://www.gnustep.o...ion/manual_6.html] could be the basis for the inter-process object APIs needed for such a thing.

--
Chris Altmann
     Porting the WPS - (Another Scott) - (10)
         Re: Porting the WPS - (deSitter)
         Yes, that's what I've heard all along . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (5)
             More likely - (deSitter)
             the PM layer could be completely replaced - (deSitter) - (3)
                 OINE - (altmann) - (1)
                     Re: OINE - (deSitter)
                 PM's not the problem. At least not the biggest problem. - (Another Scott)
         Reimplementing the WPS - (jake123) - (2)
             Re: Reimplementing the WPS - (deSitter) - (1)
                 GNUStep? Maybe - (altmann)

There are some who call me... LRPD.
91 ms