IWETHEY v. 0.3.0
|
TODO
1,095 registered users | 0
active users
| 0 LpH |
Statistics
Login
|
Create New User
Welcome to IWETHEY!
IWETHEY Home
/
IWETHEY Board
/
Open Forum
/
jpegs don't *have* to be lossy
Post #59,254
by
wharris2
10/24/02 8:40:28 PM
Reply
jpegs don't *have* to be lossy
But I don't know how well the 0% loss jpeg stacks up against PNG.
Dunno where to put this - graphic compression
- (
broomberg
)
- (9)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 07:35:34 PM EDT
jpegs are lossy
- (
imric
)
- (2)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 07:43:42 PM EDT
jpegs don't *have* to be lossy
- (
wharris2
)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 08:40:28 PM EDT
Yup I know
- (
broomberg
)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 09:10:21 PM EDT
PNG or JPEG
- (
admin
)
- (2)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 08:03:14 PM EDT
Thanks on the QA
- (
broomberg
)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 09:16:37 PM EDT
More to the point (follow the line...)
- (
kmself
)
- Oct. 24, 2002, 11:32:05 PM EDT
Faxes would be "bi-level" images, and the best
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- (2)
- Oct. 26, 2002, 10:31:36 PM EDT
I thought faxes support gray-scale?
-NT
- (
Arkadiy
)
- (1)
- Oct. 28, 2002, 10:11:22 AM EST
No. Group 3/group 4 compression of a fax is bi-level.
- (
a6l6e6x
)
- Oct. 28, 2002, 09:37:20 PM EST
i
we
they
.org
Powered by the lights of perverted science!
61 ms