Umm, well, yeah, but ... uhhh

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #58,888 by drewk 10/23/02 2:43:50 PM Reply	Umm, well, yeah, but ... uhhh CrrrrrrrAP! I'm even forced to admit that it's possible "instantiation" might have been correct in the first instance. === Microsoft offers them the one thing most business people will pay any price for - the ability to say "we had no choice - everyone's doing it that way." -- [link\|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=38978\|Andrew Grygus]
Post #58,889 by admin 10/23/02 2:44:36 PM Reply	Welll... WTF did you think I linked to Merriam Webster for...? Regards, -scott anderson "Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson..."

I've learned something new in C++ today! - (Arkadiy) - (36) - Oct. 21, 2002, 03:36:00 PM EDT

Criminy - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 21, 2002, 03:37:58 PM EDT

No, just what I needed :) -NT - (Arkadiy) - (1) - Oct. 21, 2002, 06:55:35 PM EDT

No Way! - (deSitter) - Oct. 21, 2002, 08:14:22 PM EDT

Re: I've learned something new in C++ today! - (wharris2) - (1) - Oct. 21, 2002, 11:47:12 PM EDT

Crawl? Run, run! -NT - (Arkadiy) - Oct. 22, 2002, 09:37:34 AM EDT

Don't forget your extra space - (tuberculosis) - (30) - Oct. 22, 2002, 06:37:58 AM EDT

Re: Don't forget your extra space - (Arkadiy) - (29) - Oct. 22, 2002, 09:40:20 AM EDT

Fear the syntax error messages... -NT - (admin) - Oct. 22, 2002, 10:37:44 AM EDT

No, wait, I need more context. - (tuberculosis) - (25) - Oct. 23, 2002, 07:21:44 AM EDT

Wow! - (Arkadiy) - (24) - Oct. 23, 2002, 10:05:52 AM EDT

Grammar police - (drewk) - (18) - Oct. 23, 2002, 10:30:54 AM EDT

No - (deSitter) - Oct. 23, 2002, 10:38:00 AM EDT

Spelling police - (Arkadiy) - (16) - Oct. 23, 2002, 11:38:00 AM EDT

Arrrgh! - (drewk) - (15) - Oct. 23, 2002, 11:40:55 AM EDT

Instantiation has been in use for a long time... - (admin) - (14) - Oct. 23, 2002, 11:44:12 AM EDT

Careful, keep this up and you'll be agreeing with ... - (drewk) - (13) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:11:23 PM EDT

Re: Careful, keep this up and you'll be agreeing with ... - (admin) - (12) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:15:22 PM EDT

Then I hereby nominate ... objectification - (drewk) - (11) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:22:27 PM EDT

Re: Then I hereby nominate ... objectification - (admin) - (10) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:24:56 PM EDT

He meant "objectifaction" - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:27:28 PM EDT

Re: He meant "objectifaction" - (admin) - Oct. 23, 2002, 12:29:04 PM EDT

Not as a noun, though - (drewk) - (7) - Oct. 23, 2002, 01:31:13 PM EDT

Objectification IS a noun, you knob. -NT - (admin) - (6) - Oct. 23, 2002, 02:21:20 PM EDT

Umm, well, yeah, but ... uhhh - (drewk) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2002, 02:43:50 PM EDT

Welll... - (admin) - Oct. 23, 2002, 02:44:36 PM EDT

You've been using that a lot lately. - (static) - (3) - Oct. 24, 2002, 02:01:53 AM EDT

Well I know where *I* got it from - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 24, 2002, 03:11:38 AM EDT

My (obvious) guess: Peter. - (CRConrad) - Oct. 24, 2002, 07:54:05 AM EDT

Dunno. - (admin) - Oct. 24, 2002, 09:07:48 AM EDT

I'm not saying its good. - (tuberculosis) - (4) - Oct. 23, 2002, 11:59:02 AM EDT

Was trying to avoid virtual functions - (Arkadiy) - (3) - Oct. 23, 2002, 01:57:40 PM EDT

ROFL - "This prog might actually do something needing speed" -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 23, 2002, 02:01:17 PM EDT

Write the program you want - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Oct. 24, 2002, 04:22:55 AM EDT

I know, I know. - (Arkadiy) - Oct. 24, 2002, 09:31:49 AM EDT

Ow ow ow ow ow ow - (static) - (1) - Oct. 23, 2002, 07:18:46 AM EDT

Run away! run Away! - (boxley) - Oct. 23, 2002, 09:21:16 AM EDT

Yow!
45 ms