"didn't accept them"?
If I go tit for tat I get bitched at for shift...and Brandi won't accept anything anyway (as evidenced by the last time where his own links screwed his own argument and this time where links have already been provided...he just didn't accept them)No. The shift occures when you do NOT directly address the PREVIOUS post.
Like your comment about Ollie acting alone.
I have addressed your links.
And Silverlock has provided other links showing that such a meeting did NOT take place.
Rather than provide MORE links to support your position, you resort to "possibly" and "maybe" and such crap.
The CIA itself says there is no "substantial evidence" to support your allegations.
But, instead of dealing with that claim, which I have previously posted, you'll cry about everything else.
Deal with the FACTS, not the part where you "know" they are doing it.
But, like I said, religions don't need facts.
