Once again, you are wrong.
There are specific and documented cases of Iraqi officials meeting with or associating with Al Q terrorists either directly or through other organizations...much like out our own association with Al Q during the Soviet invastion of Afghanistan.Fine, then link to them. You can keep claiming that they exist, but until you provide the links, they're just in your imagination.
But you choose to deny that...not because its not plausible...but simply because it opposes my statement and you can toy around with pretenting to know, even remotely, what my "religious" beliefs are.Again, it is simple to prove me wrong.
Just provide the links that state what you say they do.
I'm going to go on the record here and say that such links do NOT exist.
Therefore, you will NOT be able to provide them.
Although you will continue to claim that you COULD provide them.
There are specific and documented cases of Iraqi officials meeting with or associating with Al Q terrorists either directly or through other organizations...much like out our own association with Al Q during the Soviet invastion of Afghanistan.Again, provide links.
The CIA has said that they haven't found ANY "substantial evidence" linking Saddam to al Queda.
You claim that there is such evidence.
You must have mistaken me with yourself...someone who can't seem to realize that he isn't right 100% of the time...sad for you that you think the rest of the world are idiots when the truth is so much closer to home.Again, it is sooooo simple to prove me wrong.
Just provide the evidence that the CIA says does not exist.
It doesn't get much easier than that.
Then you would PROVEN that I was wrong.
Instead, what "evidence" do you provide?
Your reference to Ollie acting alone.
ooooooooookay.
The problems with you religious types is that you can't distinguish between a fact and your fantasy.
