"WTF is wrong with that picture?"

Post #57,832 by Brandioch 10/19/02 1:50:01 PM Reply	"WTF is wrong with that picture?" Simple, you cannot process information that does not agree with your religion. There are just as many examples of the US government doing exactly the same thing. The "anti-hawks" will use these examples regularly to make the point that we (the US) are not blameless for the hate instilled against our country...but I use that same pattern recognition in this case and y'all are jumping up and down telling me the CIA (puleaze) doesn't agree with me so I must be wrong? Emphasis added. Yes, there are specific examples of the US governments behaviour. Specific and documented. Those examples establish a pattern. Now, you attempt to take the US pattern and say that it applies to Iraq in this case. Yet you have no specific examples of Iraqi behaviour to support that pattern. Because the US has done so, you claim that Iraq has done so. Your support for this claim is based, not in facts, but in the POSSIBILITY that Iraq COULD have done so. Al Capone cheated on his taxes. Al Capone killed people. Mr. X cheates on his taxes. Therefore, Mr. X MIGHT also be a murderer. He might, he might not. And the logic is flawed. But you will never understand that.
Post #57,876 by bepatient 10/19/02 8:37:52 PM Reply	Sure I can. You must have mistaken me with yourself...someone who can't seem to realize that he isn't right 100% of the time...sad for you that you think the rest of the world are idiots when the truth is so much closer to home. There are specific and documented cases of Iraqi officials meeting with or associating with Al Q terrorists either directly or through other organizations...much like out our own association with Al Q during the Soviet invastion of Afghanistan. But you choose to deny that...not because its not plausible...but simply because it opposes my statement and you can toy around with pretenting to know, even remotely, what my "religious" beliefs are. Yep...just to be an asshole. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #57,901 by Brandioch 10/19/02 10:27:56 PM Reply	Once again, you are wrong. There are specific and documented cases of Iraqi officials meeting with or associating with Al Q terrorists either directly or through other organizations...much like out our own association with Al Q during the Soviet invastion of Afghanistan. Fine, then link to them. You can keep claiming that they exist, but until you provide the links, they're just in your imagination. But you choose to deny that...not because its not plausible...but simply because it opposes my statement and you can toy around with pretenting to know, even remotely, what my "religious" beliefs are. Again, it is simple to prove me wrong. Just provide the links that state what you say they do. I'm going to go on the record here and say that such links do NOT exist. Therefore, you will NOT be able to provide them. Although you will continue to claim that you COULD provide them. There are specific and documented cases of Iraqi officials meeting with or associating with Al Q terrorists either directly or through other organizations...much like out our own association with Al Q during the Soviet invastion of Afghanistan. Again, provide links. The CIA has said that they haven't found ANY "substantial evidence" linking Saddam to al Queda. You claim that there is such evidence. You must have mistaken me with yourself...someone who can't seem to realize that he isn't right 100% of the time...sad for you that you think the rest of the world are idiots when the truth is so much closer to home. Again, it is sooooo simple to prove me wrong. Just provide the evidence that the CIA says does not exist. It doesn't get much easier than that. Then you would PROVEN that I was wrong. Instead, what "evidence" do you provide? Your reference to Ollie acting alone. ooooooooookay. The problems with you religious types is that you can't distinguish between a fact and your fantasy.
Post #57,902 by bepatient 10/19/02 10:34:29 PM Reply	You are so predictable. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #57,940 by CRConrad 10/20/02 7:16:07 AM Reply	And you think that wasn't?
Post #57,956 by bepatient 10/20/02 12:59:45 PM Reply	Quite frankly... I don't give a fuck if it was or not. If I go tit for tat I get bitched at for shift...and Brandi won't accept anything anyway (as evidenced by the last time where his own links screwed his own argument and this time where links have already been provided...he just didn't accept them) So I politely tell him to go stuff..and now I expect a reaction from you and most likely Ashton.. That, my European friend, is exactly what I expected. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #57,961 by Brandioch 10/20/02 1:53:20 PM Reply	"didn't accept them"? If I go tit for tat I get bitched at for shift...and Brandi won't accept anything anyway (as evidenced by the last time where his own links screwed his own argument and this time where links have already been provided...he just didn't accept them) No. The shift occures when you do NOT directly address the PREVIOUS post. Like your comment about Ollie acting alone. I have addressed your links. And Silverlock has provided other links showing that such a meeting did NOT take place. Rather than provide MORE links to support your position, you resort to "possibly" and "maybe" and such crap. The CIA itself says there is no "substantial evidence" to support your allegations. But, instead of dealing with that claim, which I have previously posted, you'll cry about everything else. Deal with the FACTS, not the part where you "know" they are doing it. But, like I said, religions don't need facts.
Post #57,962 by bepatient 10/20/02 1:54:24 PM Reply	yep...right...whatever you say. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #57,964 by Brandioch 10/20/02 2:00:00 PM Reply	And, once again, another discussion ends with you retreating into sarcasm. Because you couldn't find two facts to rub together. Rather than admit you were WRONG, you'll hide behind sarcasm and innuendo. Pathetic.
Post #57,966 by bepatient 10/20/02 2:32:37 PM Reply	Yep...you're right...you're always right. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!