paper msce then

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #55,702 by boxley 10/9/02 8:04:34 AM Reply	paper msce then will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] "Therefore, by objective standards, the leading managers of the U.S. economy...are collectively, clinically insane." Lyndon LaRouche
Post #55,705 by pwhysall 10/9/02 8:15:18 AM Reply	Haha. One might have been capable of being a paper MCSE back in the days of NT4, but in the W2K world it's just not a runner - there's 7 exams (4 core plus three electives) and they're bloody hard for a total of 24 hours of exams. I did thirty days of training and that doesn't including the days and days I spend swotting for the exams themselves. Paper MCSE? A term thrown about by those who don't know what the current MCSE qualification entails, methinks :-) Often, I think, the term arises in reference to MCPs - i.e. individuals who have passed ONE exam. Peter [link\|http://www.debian.org\|Shill For Hire] [link\|http://www.kuro5hin.org\|There is no K5 Cabal] [link\|http://guildenstern.dyndns.org\|Blog]
Post #55,734 by boxley 10/9/02 10:04:50 AM Reply	based on having one as a project manager She had the cert (nt4.0 at the time) and was screaming at me because she couldnt figure out how to open MSword under win3.1. She trained on 95 it seems and never actually took apart a computer much less understood how networks work. If the training has gotten better I will not refer to them that way again. thanx, bill will work for cash and other incentives [link\|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html\|skill set] "Therefore, by objective standards, the leading managers of the U.S. economy...are collectively, clinically insane." Lyndon LaRouche

Use LVM? - (broomberg) - (45) - Oct. 6, 2002, 05:29:41 PM EDT

Reason they never applied the patches... - (folkert) - (1) - Oct. 6, 2002, 05:50:28 PM EDT

Oh, they KNOW what they are doing - (broomberg) - Oct. 6, 2002, 06:14:54 PM EDT

Ultimately, code and licensing are what count - (rickmoen) - (42) - Oct. 7, 2002, 02:33:52 AM EDT

Wow, a legend - (broomberg) - (41) - Oct. 7, 2002, 11:38:55 PM EDT

tight burrows and squeeking - (boxley) - (23) - Oct. 8, 2002, 12:48:36 AM EDT

Translation please? -NT - (broomberg) - (22) - Oct. 8, 2002, 06:40:43 AM EDT

If you got the source its your to do what you please - (boxley) - (21) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:47:45 AM EDT

Sorry - (broomberg) - (20) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:38:31 AM EDT

not an interview but not even a call for an interview - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:03:48 PM EDT

Re: Sorry - (deSitter) - (18) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:57:38 PM EDT

You are reading that differently than I do - (ben_tilly) - (17) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:08:04 PM EDT

Re: You are reading that differently than I do - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:15:35 PM EDT

naw barry's cool, he will grunt out a position - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:09:33 PM EDT

Wow, I NEEDED to reread that link - (broomberg) - (14) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:38:29 PM EDT

perhaps your co-worker had acheived go-nogo - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:48:47 PM EDT

Re: Wow, I NEEDED to reread that link - (deSitter) - (12) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:02:59 PM EDT

Helpfulness? - (broomberg) - (11) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:37:05 PM EDT

As I said - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:39:20 PM EDT

As I said - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:39:36 PM EDT

headcount headcount headcount - (boxley) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:42:39 PM EDT

And by the way.. - (deSitter) - (7) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:43:59 PM EDT

You don't understand responsibility - (broomberg) - (6) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:49:37 PM EDT

Oh that's rich! - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:13:29 AM EDT

Hey. you mean they PAY you? - (broomberg) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:38:19 AM EDT

Imagine! - (deSitter) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:52:33 AM EDT

Also.. - (deSitter) - (2) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:19:36 AM EDT

Huh? - (broomberg) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:35:56 AM EDT

My bad -NT - (deSitter) - Oct. 9, 2002, 12:50:11 AM EDT

Oooh! Lookee Mommy, a legend! (right) - (deSitter) - (16) - Oct. 8, 2002, 01:36:55 PM EDT

When did you get all reasonable? - (drewk) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 04:52:20 PM EDT

Re: When did you get all reasonable? - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:40:59 PM EDT

Sorry, I usually agreed with him - (broomberg) - (13) - Oct. 8, 2002, 06:41:30 PM EDT

You would have missed it - (ben_tilly) - (5) - Oct. 8, 2002, 07:02:02 PM EDT

Eh? I though UnixMonster was referring to this thread... - (Another Scott) - (3) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:15:10 PM EDT

That moniker is no more - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:53:27 PM EDT

Just pulling your chain a little. :-) -NT - (Another Scott) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:16:23 PM EDT

Ah... - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 8, 2002, 08:58:17 PM EDT

Re: You would have missed it - (deSitter) - Oct. 8, 2002, 09:10:48 PM EDT

Re: Sorry, I usually agreed with him - (deSitter) - (6) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:17:33 PM EDT

thats not unix culture! unix culture is box goes into the - (boxley) - (4) - Oct. 8, 2002, 10:29:00 PM EDT

Oi! - (pwhysall) - (3) - Oct. 9, 2002, 03:36:00 AM EDT

paper msce then -NT - (boxley) - (2) - Oct. 9, 2002, 08:04:34 AM EDT

Haha. - (pwhysall) - (1) - Oct. 9, 2002, 08:15:18 AM EDT

based on having one as a project manager - (boxley) - Oct. 9, 2002, 10:04:50 AM EDT

Good grief. - (pwhysall) - Oct. 9, 2002, 03:31:48 AM EDT

iwethey.org

Comfort the afflicted; afflict the comfortable.
254 ms