IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New How viable?
Is the decay rate of the materials involved enough to render it unexplosive after 40 years? It's not as if you can put a bomb in a bunker and expect it to explode fifty years later, there has to be maintenance and such. (That's one reason the US has reason to be slightly optimistic in the event some rogue Russian general launches ICBM's at us; their current economic decay has not allowed them the resources to adequately maintain their arsenal.)
French Zombies are zapping me with lasers!
New Yes and no.
This vintage may or may not have used Tritium as a fusion enhancer (half-life 12.3 years) along with Li-7 (stable), though that would have been a bit early. No problem with the Pu or U. 10K+ years for Pu-239.

No doubt mechanical parts flaky and the explosives no longer trustworthy for exact performance. And it must be exact or it fizzles - then massive contamination as consolation prize.

But the physics doesn't change, nor likely would the sphere need even machining. You'd construct something new and your implosion lens would be as good as your intelligence collecting (and whether you knew how to use the fast _tron switch devices. Hell, we somehow let some of those gadgets from Berkeley Nucleonics get to Saddam's crew, a few years back).

You would get valuable insight into the layered different-velocity machined explosives, on disassembly. A chem analysis would confirm what materials you needed to find - fresh. If builder had knowledge of the multi-element later designs (?) could even increase yield...

No question that there'd be plenty to salvage after even 50 years - but work, after a quick drying out? Nahhh. Well.. how close would you want to stand for such a trial, though?



A.
     Lost Nuke - (jlalexander) - (15)
         Two words. - (inthane-chan)
         The nuke outside Savannah? - (boxley)
         Some specs on the MK-15 - (Ashton) - (1)
             Robo boo boo - (tablizer)
         How viable? - (wharris2) - (1)
             Yes and no. - (Ashton)
         Re: Thank god I am on the otherside of the planet - (dmarker2) - (4)
             Right, and, the main danger from nukes . . - (Andrew Grygus) - (2)
                 LRPD says: "Thanks for playing..."__________:-P -NT - (Ashton) - (1)
                     Mine said: First came the dinosaurs, - (drewk)
             Funny you should say that. - (a6l6e6x)
         "No detonation was observed." - (CRConrad) - (1)
             That's blindingly obvious. -NT - (inthane-chan)
         Re: Lost Nuke - (qstephens) - (1)
             US sub as well -NT - (boxley)

Non cogito ergo nihil, y'all.
84 ms