
I might be misunderstanding you.
I didn't say that the records were sealed, I said that the article did not present evidence that the attack was a hate crime by my definition. IMO, an act with intent to target a specific group with the intent to intimidate should technically be considered terrorism, not a "hate crime" - it fits the definition, after all.
End of world rescheduled for day after tomorrow. Something should probably be done. Please advise.