IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New You're kidding, right?
I haven't dealt with memory juggling
in about 9 years. Went from 'C' to
Perl and never looked back.

Well, not exactly. Sometimes you still
need to code in a certain way to ensure
efficient use of memory, and to make
sure you don't have any leaks.

But you never dance on the stack.
New I do perl scripting not perl programming :-)
and since I was a tadpole I was taught to explicitly get an adress space and make sure the OS knew I was done with it when I was finished. Since scripting batches is quite different from programming I never bothered to use bounded memory chunks. Remember I program in self defence cleaning up after programmers, I wouldnt call myself a programmer.
thanx,
bill
will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/resume/Resume.html|skill set]

qui mori didicit servire dedidicit
     I believe I understand Intel's 64-bit strategy - (ben_tilly) - (13)
         short answer, thunk (it is implemented isnt it?) -NT - (boxley)
         Works on another level to - (JayMehaffey) - (9)
             Yeah, but they'll have more problems this time - (tonytib) - (8)
                 Another difference - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                     Actually, could be more - (JayMehaffey) - (3)
                         Return of EMS/XMS anyone? - (lister)
                         Of course it *can* be done - (ben_tilly)
                         Whee! - (admin)
                     boy now I feel really old - (boxley) - (2)
                         You're kidding, right? - (broomberg) - (1)
                             I do perl scripting not perl programming :-) - (boxley)
         Perhaps I'm misunderstanding.... - (Another Scott) - (1)
             I know it is not the first time - (ben_tilly)

Maybe this is what seafood will do in a thousand years.
43 ms