IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Stock buybacks are as good as dividends
The question isn't really whether you get dividends. It is whether profits in a company ever come back to investors.

Stock buybacks are merely another way to do that, and one which has better tax consequences.

As for stocks, there are arguments every way for how they should be now. Long-term they are extremely likely to be a solid investment. Make your own decisions, and as long as you are not ridiculous about it, it will probably work out OK in the end.

Cheers,
Ben
"Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly."
- [link|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html|Walter Mead]
New So is MS's behavior (stocking $$) good or bad for investors?
New Mixed
It allows value to accumulate without taking tax consequences. Unless it is ruled illegal, in which case everyone except Uncle Sam loses. So it has been good for major Microsoft investors (particularly Bill Gates), but is legally risky.

But it is fair to point out that Microsoft is in a form of business where they need to make large and risky long-term investments. This limits them to lines of business with very high returns, and gives them a legitimate reason to have large reserves. (If not as absurdly large as the ones that they currently have...)

Cheers,
Ben
"Career politicians are inherently untrustworthy; if it spends its life buzzing around the outhouse, it\ufffds probably a fly."
- [link|http://www.nationalinterest.org/issues/58/Mead.html|Walter Mead]
New informed investors
Long-term they are extremely likely to be a solid investment.

My main argument for dividends is that they make it easier for stocks to be a decent medium-term investment, not just long-term, because it is clearer what you are getting (based on history). You can rely less on income statements, which are too subject to Enron-like manipulation. Thus, less volitility.

If they were just taxed less. I suppose congress did it this way to encourage direct reinvestment.
________________
oop.ismad.com
     historic p/e ratio chart - (tablizer) - (8)
         Fascinating -NT - (deSitter)
         Thank you - (ben_tilly) - (1)
             So much for Horatio Alger - - (Ashton)
         P/E versus dividends - (tablizer) - (4)
             Stock buybacks are as good as dividends - (ben_tilly) - (3)
                 So is MS's behavior (stocking $$) good or bad for investors? -NT - (tonytib) - (1)
                     Mixed - (ben_tilly)
                 informed investors - (tablizer)

Golden Service, Incorporated
38 ms