IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

IWETHEY Home / IWETHEY Board / Theory and Practice of Programming Forum / Not me
Post #54,629
by tuberculosis
Picture of tuberculosis
10/3/02 8:37:49 AM
Reply
New Not me
I spent the weekend marrying [link|http://www.fscript.org|FScript] and [link|http://www.toodarkpark.org/computers/objc/|Objective C] with [link|http://www.ghg.net/clips/CLIPS.html|CLIPS].

I need to do a cocoa UI and a palette for Interface Builder. Then you'll have expert systems capabilities at your fingertips as needed. Just define the rules for your objects and the system enforces them. Also need to define several deftemplates for common system classes.

Java, C##, Javascript, these languages are all from the dark ages. Who needs em?
I am out of the country for the duration of the Bush administration.
Please leave a message and I'll get back to you when democracy returns.
Post #55,026
by tonytib
10/5/02 1:55:11 AM
Reply
New You've got life easy
just try dealing with some of the stuff I sometimes have to deal with in industrial automation -- they make C look good.

For example, recently, I have had to write a Logo! program in its version of ladder logic, Aromat IEC61131 program (I used Structured Text, which looks a bit like Pascal, but has some very interesting quirks), and an Animatics SmartMotor program (roughly similar to GW BASIC). At least all three of them were short.

Python is so much more fun -- and productive. Thankfully, I've been doing some of that, too lately, along a bit of wiring and electrical troubleshooting. I haven't blown anything up yet -- but some of my coworkers tried.

Tony
     Comments Invited on Adobe Javascript - (deSitter) - (40) - Oct. 1, 2002, 11:44:40 PM EDT
         Why can't they pick a better language? - (ben_tilly) - (37) - Oct. 2, 2002, 06:25:28 AM EDT
             I agree. - (static) - (4) - Oct. 2, 2002, 08:08:22 AM EDT
                 Re: I agree. - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 2, 2002, 09:48:51 AM EDT
                     Same language... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2002, 12:21:23 PM EDT
                         Re: Same language... - (deSitter) - Oct. 2, 2002, 12:44:40 PM EDT
                     I didn't look. - (static) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:16:32 PM EDT
             You Perl people must like... - (ChrisR) - (31) - Oct. 2, 2002, 03:03:22 PM EDT
                 not new vernacular but sigil doesnt mean sigil anymore? - (boxley) - Oct. 2, 2002, 04:19:33 PM EDT
                 I didn't invent it - (ben_tilly) - (29) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:03:51 PM EDT
                     Re: I didn't invent it - (deSitter) - (28) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:37:42 PM EDT
                         It isn't, necessarily - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:55:24 PM EDT
                             Re: It isn't, necessarily - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:58:33 PM EDT
                                 Why is that wrong? - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 2, 2002, 08:03:32 PM EDT
                                 Not me - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2002, 08:37:49 AM EDT
                                     You've got life easy - (tonytib) - Oct. 5, 2002, 01:55:11 AM EDT
                         Not idiomatically. - (static) - (22) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:19:07 PM EDT
                             In Perl they are dereferencing operators -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:26:22 PM EDT
                             semicolon rant IV - (tablizer) - (20) - Oct. 3, 2002, 01:43:33 AM EDT
                                 Or you can use periods. - (tuberculosis) - (19) - Oct. 3, 2002, 08:41:17 AM EDT
                                     re: periods - (tablizer) - (18) - Oct. 5, 2002, 12:40:32 AM EDT
                                         re: periods - (deSitter) - (17) - Oct. 6, 2002, 06:29:49 PM EDT
                                             Huh? -NT - (tablizer) - (16) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:40:57 PM EDT
                                                 Re: Huh? - (deSitter) - (15) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:59:35 AM EDT
                                                     Who is "everyone"? - (tablizer) - (5) - Oct. 17, 2002, 03:53:17 PM EDT
                                                         Once More With Feeling - (deSitter) - (4) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:09:06 PM EDT
                                                             I don't care about the 1970's, I hate them here and now - (tablizer) - (3) - Oct. 18, 2002, 11:20:43 PM EDT
                                                                 Simple solution. - (static) - Oct. 19, 2002, 12:43:55 AM EDT
                                                                 The Galileo of Computing! - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 19, 2002, 01:54:47 AM EDT
                                                                     Others complain too - (tablizer) - Oct. 22, 2002, 02:32:44 AM EDT
                                                     Wrong. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:12:06 PM EDT
                                                         Re: Wrong. - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:34:53 PM EDT
                                                             This is a general trend - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 18, 2002, 07:25:31 AM EDT
                                                     Historical trivia that applies... - (hnick) - (5) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:41:27 PM EDT
                                                         Nah, not Kernighan and Ritchie. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Oct. 17, 2002, 09:59:49 PM EDT
                                                             Right, Not K&R - (hnick) - (3) - Oct. 18, 2002, 08:13:04 AM EDT
                                                                 Don't be. Sorry, I mean. -NT - (CRConrad) - Oct. 18, 2002, 08:30:21 AM EDT
                                                                 Re: Right, Not K&R - (deSitter) - Oct. 18, 2002, 12:37:33 PM EDT
                                                                 Actually, might it have been a "standard" to fit terminals? - (wharris2) - Oct. 21, 2002, 12:00:00 PM EDT
         Initial Comments - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2002, 06:26:07 PM EDT
             Re: Initial Comments - (deSitter) - Oct. 7, 2002, 10:01:48 AM EDT

Who's got a match?
52 ms