Same language...

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #54,479 by ChrisR 10/2/02 12:21:23 PM Reply	Same language... ...different core objects. That is, html is built on top of the Document Object Model (DOM), whereas Adobe uses their own pdf document model. Means that the syntax and basic operators are the same, but the core objects which can be manipulated are different.
Post #54,492 by deSitter 10/2/02 12:44:40 PM Reply	Re: Same language... That's sort of what I've gathered, in not so precise language. That clarifies it for me. -drl

Comments Invited on Adobe Javascript - (deSitter) - (40) - Oct. 1, 2002, 11:44:40 PM EDT

Why can't they pick a better language? - (ben_tilly) - (37) - Oct. 2, 2002, 06:25:28 AM EDT

I agree. - (static) - (4) - Oct. 2, 2002, 08:08:22 AM EDT

Re: I agree. - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 2, 2002, 09:48:51 AM EDT

Same language... - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2002, 12:21:23 PM EDT

Re: Same language... - (deSitter) - Oct. 2, 2002, 12:44:40 PM EDT

I didn't look. - (static) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:16:32 PM EDT

You Perl people must like... - (ChrisR) - (31) - Oct. 2, 2002, 03:03:22 PM EDT

not new vernacular but sigil doesnt mean sigil anymore? - (boxley) - Oct. 2, 2002, 04:19:33 PM EDT

I didn't invent it - (ben_tilly) - (29) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:03:51 PM EDT

Re: I didn't invent it - (deSitter) - (28) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:37:42 PM EDT

It isn't, necessarily - (ben_tilly) - (4) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:55:24 PM EDT

Re: It isn't, necessarily - (deSitter) - (3) - Oct. 2, 2002, 07:58:33 PM EDT

Why is that wrong? - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 2, 2002, 08:03:32 PM EDT

Not me - (tuberculosis) - (1) - Oct. 3, 2002, 08:37:49 AM EDT

You've got life easy - (tonytib) - Oct. 5, 2002, 01:55:11 AM EDT

Not idiomatically. - (static) - (22) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:19:07 PM EDT

In Perl they are dereferencing operators -NT - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 2, 2002, 10:26:22 PM EDT

semicolon rant IV - (tablizer) - (20) - Oct. 3, 2002, 01:43:33 AM EDT

Or you can use periods. - (tuberculosis) - (19) - Oct. 3, 2002, 08:41:17 AM EDT

re: periods - (tablizer) - (18) - Oct. 5, 2002, 12:40:32 AM EDT

re: periods - (deSitter) - (17) - Oct. 6, 2002, 06:29:49 PM EDT

Huh? -NT - (tablizer) - (16) - Oct. 8, 2002, 11:40:57 PM EDT

Re: Huh? - (deSitter) - (15) - Oct. 9, 2002, 11:59:35 AM EDT

Who is "everyone"? - (tablizer) - (5) - Oct. 17, 2002, 03:53:17 PM EDT

Once More With Feeling - (deSitter) - (4) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:09:06 PM EDT

I don't care about the 1970's, I hate them here and now - (tablizer) - (3) - Oct. 18, 2002, 11:20:43 PM EDT

Simple solution. - (static) - Oct. 19, 2002, 12:43:55 AM EDT

The Galileo of Computing! - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 19, 2002, 01:54:47 AM EDT

Others complain too - (tablizer) - Oct. 22, 2002, 02:32:44 AM EDT

Wrong. - (admin) - (2) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:12:06 PM EDT

Re: Wrong. - (deSitter) - (1) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:34:53 PM EDT

This is a general trend - (ben_tilly) - Oct. 18, 2002, 07:25:31 AM EDT

Historical trivia that applies... - (hnick) - (5) - Oct. 17, 2002, 05:41:27 PM EDT

Nah, not Kernighan and Ritchie. - (a6l6e6x) - (4) - Oct. 17, 2002, 09:59:49 PM EDT

Right, Not K&R - (hnick) - (3) - Oct. 18, 2002, 08:13:04 AM EDT

Don't be. Sorry, I mean. -NT - (CRConrad) - Oct. 18, 2002, 08:30:21 AM EDT

Re: Right, Not K&R - (deSitter) - Oct. 18, 2002, 12:37:33 PM EDT

Actually, might it have been a "standard" to fit terminals? - (wharris2) - Oct. 21, 2002, 12:00:00 PM EDT

Initial Comments - (ChrisR) - (1) - Oct. 2, 2002, 06:26:07 PM EDT

Re: Initial Comments - (deSitter) - Oct. 7, 2002, 10:01:48 AM EDT

The cancers of the tank come!
58 ms