IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Exactly. You violated copiright consciously, then.
When (and if) the authors decide that the article should now become a paid content, you will have your illegal copy.

I just hope you'll never have to write for living.
We have only 2 things to worry about: That things will never get back to normal, and that they already have.
New I am a writer
of computer software, and have been going on 25 years. However, since I've never copyrighted any of it (and since my employers retained ownership of the source code) I can't say that I know how the author(s) feel about the situation.

They have already been paid for their writing already, and they're free to charge anybody and everybody for a pay-per-view. If they get more than 1 person willing to pay to see their work, more power to them. If they come here asking for money, the admins just have to delete the post, and end of story.


lincoln
"Four score and seven years ago, I had a better sig"
New If it's written, it's copyrighted.
[link|http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/102.html|17 USC 102(a)]:
Copyright protection subsists, in accordance with this title, in original works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either directly or with the
aid of a machine or device. Works of authorship include the following categories:

(1) literary works;
(2) musical works, including any accompanying words;
(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music;
(4) pantomimes and choreographic works;
(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works;
(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works;
(7) sound recordings; and
(8) architectural works.
Emphasis added.

Fixation is the key. This is a work governed by copyright.

There are limitations. If you're a federal government employee, you belong to one of the few classes of people who may create works not governed by copyright, and there are exemptions to copyright protections. See link above for details.

Works for hire are owned by your employer.
--
Karsten M. Self [link|mailto:kmself@ix.netcom.com|kmself@ix.netcom.com]
[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|[link|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/|http://kmself.home.netcom.com/]]
What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?
[link|http://twiki.iwethey.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/|TWikIWETHEY] -- an experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever.

   Keep software free.     Oppose the CBDTPA.     Kill S.2048 dead.
[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|[link|http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html|http://www.eff.org/...a_alert.html]]
     "HP: following DEC's fate as Microsoft VAR?" - The Register - (lincoln) - (14)
         You *DO* know that that is a copyright violation? - (ben_tilly) - (13)
             Yes, but... - (lincoln) - (5)
                 Er. - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Which is why I said "most" sites, not "all" - (lincoln)
                 Exactly. You violated copiright consciously, then. - (Arkadiy) - (2)
                     I am a writer - (lincoln) - (1)
                         If it's written, it's copyrighted. - (kmself)
             Ameliorated by complete attribution. - (Ashton) - (1)
                 Yes we do - (drewk)
             Particularly since... - (kmself) - (4)
                 Not disagreeing with you on points made - (lincoln) - (3)
                     Your answers - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                         Mein Gott, ben - (wharris2) - (1)
                             *blush* - (ben_tilly)

I'm sorry Dave, but Dave's friend Dave says Dave's at Dave's house.
55 ms