Unconditional forced ranking/firing is bad

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #51,986 by wharris2 9/16/02 11:20:21 PM Reply	Unconditional forced ranking/firing is bad But ranking is not necessarily bad in and of itself. The lawyers would mostly rather be what they are than get out of the way even if the cost was Hammerfall. - Jerry Pournelle
Post #51,992 by Ashton 9/17/02 12:43:30 AM Reply	Is 'ranking' then, done with the same consummate skill as say, the 'IQ Test' ? By humans, about humans - and with those lasting consequences.. in both cases. We Love to put numbers not merely on things - but people too. Then we believe the numbers mean something. Rest case. Ashton

The Folly of Forced Rankings at employee annual review time - (lincoln) - (6) - Sept. 12, 2002, 12:13:12 PM EDT

Mr. Welch, meet GW Bush - (Ashton) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2002, 02:35:47 AM EDT

Of course Bush was right - (ben_tilly) - Sept. 13, 2002, 07:28:40 AM EDT

One-line summary - (drewk) - (1) - Sept. 13, 2002, 09:14:20 AM EDT

Not a matter of trust, but commoditization - (mhuber) - Sept. 23, 2002, 12:16:21 AM EDT

Unconditional forced ranking/firing is bad - (wharris2) - (1) - Sept. 16, 2002, 11:20:21 PM EDT

Is 'ranking' then, done with the same consummate skill as - (Ashton) - Sept. 17, 2002, 12:43:30 AM EDT

Wow, now I'm going to get a sparkly jacket and call myself a witch...
61 ms