So how far will the pendulum swing the other way?
Not to disparage the crux of the argument presented (which I happen to agree with). But beyond this system (or any other system) of manglementmanagement, there is an overarching desire to find that panacea, that magic bullet that will a) make everything easy, and b) make you profitable and rich beyond your wildest dreams. I'll phrase this the "War for the Panacea" to maintain the theme. Management strives for this above all other. Why else would such a stupid thing as the "War for Talent" become as potent as it did? It was the "panacea du jour", and management flocked to it like flies to bovine excrement.
Now to my point. This, like all panaceas before it, has been rightfully debunked. What will replace it? Well, when a panacea is debunked, the natural management reaction is to do just the opposite (it's the easiest response). Hence, instead of looking for talent, management will look for average Joes (or perhaps, even sub-average Joes, as those in a position of power do like to feel superior, almost paternalistic). This will result sooner or later in the Peter Principle rulling the corporate halls. I've already seen it here, where management believes that just throwing bodies at a problem (regardless of the bodies' qualifications, capabilities, or...yes, talent) is sufficient to solve it. (It's the old saw about making a baby in a month by making 9 women pregnant....)
What they really need is people who are not afraid to work, and a corpulentcorporate culture that permits taking reasonable risks, rewards those who do and succeed, and tolerates (for a while, at least) those who do and fail.
Good luck finding that combination in 21st century Corporate America....
jb4
"About the use of language: it is impossible to sharpen a pencil with a blunt axe. It is equally vain to try to do it with ten blunt axes instead. "
-- Edsger W.Dijkstra (1930 - 2002)
(I wish more managers knew that...)