IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Sorry, Bill, but that's bull.
Bill tries to wiggle:
I will post a link about sex, social discourse, politics, or something that caught my eye.
Yeah; they can be about pretty much anything -- but you *call* them ALL "link" or "Earl" or something equally non-descriptive! What, can't you just *admit* that that's *stupid*?!?


When I have something that I feel will be of a high benefit of general discussion
Yeah, well, it's all very nice and good that *you* feel it "will be of a high benefit of general discussion" -- but what the fuck is so wrong with giving *us* the chance to judge that *for ourselves*?


I will preface with an All please review call and a link as well as some comments.
That doesn't really quite parse as an English sentence, but the bits I can almost make out don't actually ring any bells. When did you last write any "some comments"?


The foregoing was a sexual type link as mentioned in the subject line.
Nope -- this is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. The subject line says NOTHING about it being "a sexual type link"; it talks only about unorthodox methods of strangulation.


Follow or not read or ignore, that is the nature of a community?
Oh -- so it's necessary, because this is a community, to NOT SAY anything about WHAT we have the option to "[f]ollow or not[,] read or ignore"? How the fuck does that work? Do those of us who post *descriptive* links somehow make this LESS of a community, or what the fucking fuck is it you're saying???

[Note: Yes, logically that _I_S_ *exactly* what you are saying. Isn't it *obvious* that it is not true?]
   Christian R. Conrad
Microsoft is a true reflection of Bill Gates' personality - the sleaziest, most unethical, ugliest little rat's ass the world has seen unto this time.
-- [link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=42971|Andrew Grygus]
New Heh, I'll take issue with a couple of things
"Yeah; they can be about pretty much anything -- but you *call* them ALL "link" or "Earl" or something equally non-descriptive! What, can't you just *admit* that that's *stupid*?!?"

Well if you remember I started doing that at YOUR request, prior to that I would just cut and paste the link so someone following would know where they are being led.

"That doesn't really quite parse as an English sentence, but the bits I can almost make out don't actually ring any bells. When did you last write any "some comments"?"
[link|http://z.iwethey.org/forums/render/content/show?contentid=49932|http://z.iwethey.or...tentid=49932]
because I thought this article would have a higher general interest level than my drive by post. Knowing that "some" folks do drive by a lot of my stuff I worded it more carefully and accurately.

"Nope -- this is ABSOLUTE BULLSHIT. The subject line says NOTHING about it being "a sexual type link"; it talks only about unorthodox methods of strangulation"
That is a standard line used by several American comedians speaking about oral sex. Perhaps I forget that some of the stuff I listen to is arcane. First time I heard it was one of the muppets using it on Miss Piggy and when she actually saw it she went "thats not a monster? Thats a wee wee.

"Oh -- so it's necessary, because this is a community, to NOT SAY anything about WHAT we have the option to "[f]ollow or not[,] read or ignore"? How the fuck does that work? Do those of us who post *descriptive* links somehow make this LESS of a community, or what the fucking fuck is it you're saying???"
My apologies, I thought the issue was not enough clues in the fucking fuck post, not not enough enough clues in the fucking fucking link. :)
anything else I can help you with today? ]:->
thanx,
bill






will work for cash and other incentives [link|http://home.tampabay.rr.com/boxley/Resume.html|skill set]
     dang too old to choke him to death without using my hands :) - (boxley) - (20)
         One request - (wharris2) - (16)
             Seconded - (kmself)
             on posters posting - (boxley) - (2)
                 Sorry, Bill, but that's bull. - (CRConrad) - (1)
                     Heh, I'll take issue with a couple of things - (boxley)
             Stupid question - (ben_tilly) - (11)
                 Stupid answer - (kmself) - (9)
                     Okay...yer starting to scare me... - (Simon_Jester) - (8)
                         What I assumed... - (ben_tilly) - (7)
                             Okay ben... - (Simon_Jester) - (2)
                                 All that it means... - (ben_tilly) - (1)
                                     Nod - (Simon_Jester)
                             ...nailed... - (kmself) - (3)
                                 I apologize for the length... - (ben_tilly) - (2)
                                     Excellent link. -NT - (Silverlock)
                                     Perfect link! - (Arkadiy)
                 -obtuse arcane meaningless references -NT - (boxley)
         You just know what is going to happen... - (ben_tilly)
         Finally got it. - (Silverlock) - (1)
             if is obtuse.incluing,dont recoginse the point - (boxley)

We are the superior beings!
42 ms