I rather we use cookies

1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User

Welcome to IWETHEY!

Post #4,951 by Don 8/13/01 8:12:35 PM Reply	I rather we use cookies I hate re-logging in every time I open a new browser anyway. Can do? -Don
Post #4,952 by Ashton 8/13/01 8:21:37 PM Reply	Re: I rather we use cookies - addendum And if possible: That on each arrival they only Read an existing cookie, not update it -- if that's consistent with how you could write it (?) Natch this won't work if it should also have to update LRPD data each event. (I usually set my cookie file R/O, leave 'accept cookies' ON but filtered by WW. So any new odd cookies du jour, get lost with reboot) Set to R/W - when deliberately getting a new one.. A.
Post #5,000 by Don 8/14/01 12:05:43 AM Reply	WW can keep cookies for sites you specify You can maintain a list of sites in WW that you trust to keep cookies. It's much easier than going through the trouble of making them read-only. -Don
Post #5,002 by Ashton 8/14/01 12:16:52 AM Reply	True.. R/O may be paranoid (but only a little)

Log out button - (boxley) - (8) - Aug. 13, 2001, 02:44:57 PM EDT

No can do with Zope so far - (admin) - (1) - Aug. 13, 2001, 06:26:17 PM EDT

the mighty Zope has limitations? gasp! - (boxley) - Aug. 13, 2001, 10:33:21 PM EDT

Not ZIWETHEY's fault - (Fearless Freep) - (5) - Aug. 13, 2001, 06:54:52 PM EDT

Two choices, really: - (admin) - (4) - Aug. 13, 2001, 06:57:19 PM EDT

I rather we use cookies - (Don) - (3) - Aug. 13, 2001, 08:12:35 PM EDT

Re: I rather we use cookies - addendum - (Ashton) - (2) - Aug. 13, 2001, 08:21:37 PM EDT

WW can keep cookies for sites you specify - (Don) - (1) - Aug. 14, 2001, 12:05:43 AM EDT

True.. R/O may be paranoid (but only a little) -NT - (Ashton) - Aug. 14, 2001, 12:16:52 AM EDT

Feared.
41 ms