World's only superpower accuses small Arab country of aggression - Who is the aggressor?

What Iraqi ggression, well back in 1990 it invaded a former province of its own over an oil dispute

But Iraq 'May" be producing weapons of mass destruction - even Richard Butler can only claim "may be"
and although he is a fellow Aussie I have never quite trusted him - he is US's man - it would have been
different had he ever been able to back his constant claims against Iraq

So Iraq resented the UN weapons inspectors & made life difficult for them why ?
- How many were spies (Several govts with inspectors in Iraq got very angry at US over US spying antics)
- How many were working to undermine the country's government (this case might be easier to prove that evidence Hussien as a nuke)
- They sure never found much evidence other than 'we suspect', 'We believe', 'Hussien may be hiding ...'

But but but Saddam is a bad bad boy - yes enough distorted propaganda has painted him so - every Arab leader who ever showed a leaning to Arab unity was and will be in the future, attacked as such - let history judge Nasser today, not dissimilar

Ask yourself folks, why does the world's last superpower want to invade & topple the governemnt of a smaller country against which it has no credible evidence of anything other than resisting the demands of the superpower - there is *no* other real evidence than the opportunity to regain control of Iraqi oil production.

The appalling aspect of this is that US has next to no supporters in this outlandish venture and again I would ask people to wonder why? - is it because all these other countries are stupid & don't understand politics?- is it because they know little about the region?

But in this case I have no doubt that no matter what Saddam accepts, US has its agenda & despite almost total opposition excepet from Britain, US will go ahead & histroy will mark down the era in which a superpower openly rode roughshod over the rights and wishes of much of the rest of the world