Why not?
And isn't the big Coriolis Black Book the one that Ben Kosse loved which didn't bother doing error checks on open? Which is the kind of shortcoming that means that I would never even consider recommending it? Am I mixing it up with something else?
As for the Llama, it is simple I admit. But it doesn't do anything stupid without reason.
Programming Perl I am more ambivalent about. If you are the kind of person who can do that, starting in with "perldoc perl" and working from there gives basically the same material, only guaranteed to match whatever what is on your machine, and including various useful modules as well. OTOH it is an important book to have, even if I haven't touched either of my copies in a couple of years (except to settle arguments about what it says). And if online documentation isn't you...
But the Perl Cookbook I would add as a must-have for learning common idioms and techniques. Random example: C programmers do not generally think of having a hash whose values are irrelevant. (Why would you do that you ask? Well does the name %is_found suggest anything?:-)
Cheers,
Ben
"Perl is like vice grips. You can do anything with it, and it's the wrong tool for every job."
--Unknown