IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Outlook 2002 "Rules Wizard" is flaky
More often than not the rules don't execute on startup. Somewhere in the MS KB is an article blaming it on the conversion process from Outlook Express rules to Outlook rules, but it still happens if you enter them from scratch. Opinion from deja-google is that there is some kind of timing problem on startup and that MS is aware of it. Of course they haven't fixed it.
--
Chris Altmann
New Re: Outlook 2002 "Rules Wizard" is flaky
It works for me (hate to extrapolate from a case of 1, but will be moving all here to Office XP in the months to come) but the rules crash a lot if Outlook is left open
Still it deletes a few hundred messages each week

A
Play I Some Music w/ Papa Andy
Saturday 8 PM - 11 PM ET
All Night Rewind 11 PM - 5 PM
Reggae, African and Caribbean Music
[link|http://wxxe.org|Tune In]
New Outlook 2002 Rules Wizard
I had to fine tune them, I learned what the "Stop processing rules" did to get rid of duplicate messages when I moved them to a folder. If an email matched two rules, it would be copied to two different folders and I would have two copies of them!

I just wish that those female super models would stop sending me email linking to their naked pictures on the web. :) I'm a married man, you know.

I am free now, to choose my own destiny.
     MS Outlook -- does filtering require MS Exchange? - (kmself) - (8)
         Re: MS Outlook -- does filtering require MS Exchange? - (pwhysall)
         "Rules Wizard" - (orion) - (6)
             Outlook 2002 "Rules Wizard" is flaky - (altmann) - (2)
                 Re: Outlook 2002 "Rules Wizard" is flaky - (andread) - (1)
                     Outlook 2002 Rules Wizard - (orion)
             Don't know about "rules wizard" - (wharris2) - (2)
                 It is all in the settings - (orion) - (1)
                     Never used "key words" - (wharris2)

But he doesn't look quite skeletal enough for both to be true, does he?
62 ms