IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Simple Solution
I re-propose this every year or so, but nobody seems to like it.
I don't know why.

Both sides sign an agreement that X new isrealli settlements go up
for every Y isreallis killed by islamic terrorists. The problem
would then solve itself. (Less points for limbs, etc.)

Right now they are stuck in a "you go first" deadlock.
This would fix that.

________________
oop.ismad.com
New huh? the Pals all of them want all jews to die or go away
how could your agreement ever get agreed to? One side wants the total destruction of Israel. Everytime a closer agreement comes together the Palestinians keep pushing with terror and politics to go further. The last agreement would have put the Jews real close to the 1967 bounderies, that wasnt good enough so they move closer at Olso and start the old terror bombings to force Israel to close. I dont see any solution unless peace is wanted by a majority of both sides with a willingness to share space while allowing only Jews to decide who gets to kill Jews.(which requires them owning their own space.)
thanx,
bill
Only G_d can sort that one out one way or the other.
New Come on, BOTH sides are zealots
________________
oop.ismad.com
New yeah but one is the chicken and one the pig
the pig has a lot more commitment to your breakfast than the chicken.
thanx,
bill
Our bureaucracy and our laws have turned the world into a clean, safe work camp. We are raising a nation of slaves.
Chuck Palahniuk
     WashPost story on yesterday's bombing in Jerusalem. - (Another Scott) - (26)
         Simple Solution - (tablizer) - (3)
             huh? the Pals all of them want all jews to die or go away - (boxley) - (2)
                 Come on, BOTH sides are zealots -NT - (tablizer) - (1)
                     yeah but one is the chicken and one the pig - (boxley)
         Why is this a provocation? - (bluke)
         What a warped world we live in - (bluke) - (20)
             IMO, it's a provocation because - (Another Scott) - (19)
                 Excellent post! I could not have said it as well. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                 how very one sided of you - (boxley) - (17)
                     Nah! The Palestinians are not a monolithic... - (a6l6e6x) - (8)
                         So every attack by the Pals must be suffered - (boxley) - (7)
                             No, "turning the other cheek" is not a solution. - (a6l6e6x) - (6)
                                 doesnt the targeted assainations do just that? - (boxley) - (2)
                                     Sure, to some degree. - (a6l6e6x) - (1)
                                         arresting them is one thing - (boxley)
                                 actually a ghandi approach would work - (boxley) - (2)
                                     Point taken. -NT - (a6l6e6x)
                                     Sound psychology, but - (Ashton)
                     I think I'm fairly even-handed. - (Another Scott) - (7)
                         Not a problem with the resolution - (boxley)
                         What UN Resolution 242 really says - (bluke) - (5)
                             I think the English is clear. - (Another Scott) - (4)
                                 You can't ignore the context - (bluke) - (3)
                                     I'm not ignoring the context. - (Another Scott) - (2)
                                         please continue - (boxley)
                                         Land for peace - (bluke)

Do we really have to hide from da cops in da oven, Muggsy?
56 ms