Sorry, Bill.

Post #45,467 by Brandioch 7/13/02 2:21:19 PM Reply	Sorry, Bill. I forgot to include you in the Marlowe, Mike lovefest. You soooooo brave.
Post #45,476 by bepatient 7/13/02 3:55:03 PM Reply	Just an observation... Sounded a bit too much like "Mikey and Marlowe...sitting in a tree..." Thats all. Your further response wasn't much better. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #45,478 by Brandioch 7/13/02 4:06:51 PM Reply	The problem is. While I do acknowledge you as the expert on behaving like a child.... That does not mean I regard your opinion on whether someone else is behaving childishly as valid. You were included in that statement. You were not referenced. Yet you felt the need to include your opinion of my statement. Rather than your opinion of the content of my statement. Mike was supporting Marlowe for being "brave" and for dealing with people here. Mike was not providing references nor substantiation for Marlowe's claims. Personality over content. You had a problem with that. I am not surprised. I have previously established your pattern of lies and strawmen to "substantiate" your position. Most recently, Christian took you to task for your ignorance of basic debate principles. Yes, you are just like Mike and Marlowe. But I did not see the need to include you in that company (reference my earlier post) as you were not included in the discussion up to that point. Now you have included yourself. You, Marlowe and Mike all share the same characteristics. Have I made that clear enough for you?
Post #45,479 by bepatient 7/13/02 4:09:47 PM Reply	Figures... Mike made an observation that didn't sit well with you. Now you're all huffy about it. You've previously established nothing but your own ego. Go stroke it some more. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]
Post #45,484 by Brandioch 7/13/02 4:41:38 PM Reply	This obsession of your's is getting old. Mike made an observation that didn't sit well with you. Whatever. And my observation of his observation did not sit well with YOU. Do you have a point? If you would rather that I had not commented on his comment, then why did you comment on my comment about his comment? Ah, I understand. It's okay when you do it, but when others do it, it's not okay. Like I said, I acknowledge your expertise in acting childishly. You've previously established nothing but your own ego. That is your opinion. I, on the other hand, have references and links which show you completely mis-stating my position, multiple times and even lying about what was posted. Just as you are doing now. Whatever. If you feel the need to defend Mike and Marlowe, that's your problem. Like I've said, you three have the same characteristics. It's understandable that you'd want to defend them. For my part, I've made my point and you have yet to contradict it and this will only result in more right shifted personal attacks. Enjoy yourself. I'm out of here.
Post #45,486 by bepatient 7/13/02 6:19:40 PM Reply	Obsession? I think its pretty funny actually. Now you have me lying about your position too? I didn't even reference it. I must be better than I thought. As to your last line...one can only hope. You were born...and so you're free...so Happy Birthday! _{Laurie Anderson} [link\|mailto:bepatient@aol.com\|BePatient]

Welcome to IWETHEY!