We don't do any deep frying or use a wok though.
FWIW I found some induction kadhais online, obviously no idea how well they work.
FWIW I found some induction kadhais online, obviously no idea how well they work.
Yep, they won't be for everyone.
We don't do any deep frying or use a wok though. FWIW I found some induction kadhais online, obviously no idea how well they work. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
That stuff on the Internet is worthless.
First of all, they're all 10 inches or smaller, useless for any but apartment / condo dwellers who don't do serious cooking. Second, some are non-stick. No sane person does deep fry in a non-stick pan. Third, some are pretty stainless steel. Deep fry in one of those and you'll have to scrub it inside and out with oven cleaner - it'll look terrible. Iron and steel are supposed to develop a black varnish "seasoning", stainless is not. My kadhai is a mere 14 inches, about the smallest size for general use. India Sweets and Spices down in Glendale sells them them up to about 36 inches. Mine is stamped out of a heavy sheet of steel, and I do mean heavy, it weighs 9 pounds. A kadhai looks kind of like a wok, but is not at all the same. The radius is different and the sides are higher and more vertical. It is far better than a wok for deep fry, very much done in India, and for which I use it fairly often. On the other hand, a kadhai is not so good for East / Southeast Asian stir-fry. Recipes from that region often ask to push ingredients up the sides while adding others in the middle. The sides of a kadhai are too steep for that. Now I do use (but never for deep fry) a 13 inch tri-ply stainless wok, which would absolutely horrify any aficionado of Cantonese stir-fry - it's way to slow to respond to changes in temperature. That's OK, you can't really do Cantonese on a home stove anyway - though J Kenji Lopez-Alt has developed a way to fake it using a map-gas blow torch. 13 inches is a little cramped, but suits me most of the time, as I'm usually doing stir-fry for three or fewer people. For more demanding work I have a 14 inch carbon steel wok by Atlas Metal Spinning of San Francisco - the best ever made. Unfortunately they no longer make them. At the same time I bought that wok, 55 years ago, I bought the best Chinese cleaver knife ever made, by Dexter Russel of Massachusetts. I've used it often since then. It is still made, and a recent book by a top expert in Chinese cooking says that just about every skilled Chinese chef in the US uses that knife. They now also make a stainless steel version (at a lower price), but that's strictly for amateurs. I seldom use this knife for Chinese recipes, but consider it, and a soft faced mallet, to be one of my kitchen essentials - see Chinese Cleaver Knife & Mallet. And speaking of stuff in production for an unusual time, in the late sixties I purchased a Fluke 73 multimeter. It was just replaced by a new model about 2 years ago. That has to be some sort of record for electronic equipment. A support person once asked me on the phone if my multimeter was sensitive enough for what he wanted me to do. I said, "I don't know, it's a Fluke". His response was "Bastard!" - he apparently knew what a Fluke multimeter cost. But for something really long lasting - I think it was in the Balkans, many years ago the grave of a lady from Paleolithic hunter-gatherer times, thought to have been a shaman, was partially excavated. It was found to have an amazing amount of grave goods, from an era when grave goods were rare. Recently, excavation was completed - and they found there was a second layer of offerings made at her grave site, 700 YEARS after her death. Now that is fame. |
|
Is it though?
We tend to keep our old gods and heroes until there are new ones to replace them. Today that can be overnight. Back then it could take a generation until people at the edges of your migration range even heard of The Great Lady. Maybe that second round of offerings was just how long it took for word of her exploits to reach the other end of the savanna and back. PS about the Fluke. My wife used one at work back when we were dating. I'll have to tell her she was using The Good Stuff.[tm] -- Drew |
|
Oh yeah!
The real pros use those yellow flukes. Not me. I had a random signal generator though. That would let me trace a line. But those domain echo devices that could tell you how far away something was. I wanted one of those. I have loved my particular inductive burner for a couple of years, but it took until a few months back that I replaced all my cook gear. I found a particular non-stick that I deemed worthwhile to make an effort to keep non-stick. It's heavy enough by default to press down on the inductive surface. That's important. Most pans off balance by the handle and raise part of the pan slightly which screws up the inductive heat connection. So at this point I've rotated all the pots and pans to only have handy the guaranteed workable ones. And now I have bought many non-stick spatulas. And other cookware. But the bottom line is I want to keep everything metal away from me. Don't let me grab anything by accident. And then destroy the non-stick surface. |
|
Greenpan makes excellent nonstick
Refreshable with a melamine sponge too. Regards, -scott Welcome to Rivendell, Mr. Anderson. |
|
It was like magic
This was 25 years ago she used the Fluke, and she could tap cables in the server room and tell you how far it was to where it terminated at the other end of the building. The stuff she described being able to do amazed me. -- Drew |
|
Not likely
The grave had no monument, and only her people would know where it was and what it was. Probably they were having some problems and hoped she could help them. And that 700 years to get across the savanna? No way. Now, with DNA testing, isotope testing, and many other newfangled testing methods, archaeologists have found that travel and trade in prehistoric times was far faster, and over far greater distances, than people had imagined. There's also the matter of women. It is normal for the women found in a grave site to have come from quite a distance. It is quite apparent that young women were strongly discouraged from marrying within their village or tribal unit. Yeah, maybe they knew something about genetics. This would be why ceremonial sites were so important in hunter gatherer times, and later fairs in village times. They were not just for religion, trade, and alliances, but also for matchmaking. This reason for fairs has survived in some folk songs to this day. Due to proximity, some archaeologists think agriculture may have begun around these ceremonial sites to assure adequate beer and/or wine for events. Admittedly, the oldest formal winery we have discovered (it's in Armenia, near a ceremonial and funerary site) is only about 6000 years old, but its scale and arrangement makes it obvious this was not something new at the time. |
|
So we haven't sped up as much as I thought
Now I'm wondering, do we cycle through trends and fads as quickly as we do because of our technology, or have we built technology to support our desire to cycle through trends and fads? -- Drew |