IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New At least attempted
Nope, I'm very successful in recognizing and attempting. That's all I need to do. I stopped when static exhibited personal pain. Initially he was simply reactive and possibly could change his mind. I reacted perfectly appropriately for my personality and my recognition that everyone else in the group counts and my activity was causing pain.

This was a civil rights discussion. Combined with the trolley car problem. There was going to be winners and losers. Absolutely no way to avoid it. This is ethics 101. So I put it to him that his choice was wrong. He chose wrong on the trolley car. I did it harshly but it was very direct and he did not like it.

I'm very happy, which is a very strange thing to say, that I was not having any arguments with Greg when he died. We don't know if he killed himself. We do know he's had dramatic stress in his life. I know when I first met him and I saw the attempted suicide scars that I shouldn't fight with him as hard as I used to. So now I'm far more aware of the person on the other side and other things that could be going on that have nothing to do with the current argument that I should take into account.

On the other hand, I don't give a shit if the fake smartest person in the world is out there judging me. He's got a far more fragile front than me.
Collapse Edited by crazy Sept. 3, 2024, 10:32:29 AM EDT
At least attempted
Nope, I'm very successful in recognizing and attempting. That's all I need to do. I stopped when static exhibited personal pain. Initially he was simply reactive and possibly could change his mind. I reacted perfectly appropriately for my personality and my recognition that everyone else in the group counts and my activity was causing pain.

I'm very happy, which is a very strange thing to say, that I was not having any arguments with Greg when he died. We don't know if he killed himself. We do know he's had dramatic stress in his life. I know when I first met him and I saw the attempted suicide scars that I shouldn't fight with him as hard as I used to. So now I'm far more aware of the person on the other side and other things that could be going on that have nothing to do with the current argument that I should take into account.

On the other hand, I don't give a shit if the fake smartest person in the world is out there judging me. He's got a far more fragile front than me.
New Later this month, it wll be 10 years that Greg Folkert died.
He is one of the IWeThey members that crosses my mind too.
Alex

"There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge."

-- Isaac Asimov
New Would you quit it with the lying?
On the other hand, I don't give a shit if the fake smartest person in the world is out there judging me.


I NEVER SAID I WAS "the smartest person in the world" -- just that I "Know Fucking Everything". That's

A) Not the same thing; and

B) Not even me originally saying it. It's a quote from... I can't quite recall, but quite possibly originally from you.

It's right there to see below every post I make, so it's getting really fucking annoying that you keep claiming I've said something I haven't said. Cut it the fuck out, please. Thank you.
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New Hehe
Little touchy there.

Poke. Poke

Oops, did I pop an ego?

Even better, I inflated the ego years ago to be able to pop it now. As you said, you changed because of me.
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 4, 2024, 12:36:46 PM EDT
New Please stop being such a fuckwit.
Oops, did I pop an ego?


No. Which is why it's getting annoying that you keep claiming that you have. You need that to prop up your ego, or what?

Even better, I inflated the ego years ago to be able to pop it now. As you said, you changed because of me.
Sigh... Learn to read. If I never said "I'm the smartest person in the world" before, and I'm not saying it now, there was no change in that.

So you haven't executed any cunning plan spanning years, you've just been running this weird fantasy of yours for I don't know how long. Sorry to have to pop it.
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New Nope
You decided to attack. You are master of flames. Or maybe wet matches. And now you are sad.

So I conflated smartest guy in the world with the guy who apparently knows everything. Like there's a difference?

Your marginal ability to identify definitions of individual words and overreact and delve into deep detail on the individual word betrays your inability to understand them in context. You obviously don't know what you're talking about but boy do you know what those individual words mean.

Okay, this is the final edit. I'll leave it alone. I'll walk away.

You "apparently" know everything to yourself. I told you to put that back in because you were peacock strutting. It would be funny to see it there in the future. You are mostly presentation and very little actual content. And of course you had no idea what I was really saying. Even when you went back and reread it. You did what I told you to do. And I smiled a little and shook my head. It was kind of sad.

I know when I think I'm the smartest guy in the room. I know in this room when considering everyone else who could be in it, I'm not. Neither are you.

But I didn't set the bar so high that I'm expected to at least pretend to know everything. You've done that to yourself.

Also, the word apparent implies that you don't know everything. Not even close. But you're trying to con people into thinking you do. See, lots of subtleties in that that one line, and there's no way your ego would allow them to be self-inflicted.

You're obviously not Marilyn von whatever. But for someone who apparently knows everything you get corrected often enough.

Obviously it's a huge deal to you because it's your identity.

Pop

Of course, you will catch some trivial difference and expound on it. Enormously. That's okay. You're typically fun to read. Even when you think you're scoring points.

Points?

Yes, the internet runs on egoboo. Some of us recognize it.

One of us is relaxed and smiling while writing. The other seems a bit tense.

Hmmm. You are definitely a multilingual language master. At least on a word by word basis. Were you raised bilingual or did you pick up second languages after adolescence? If so, you have a major jump up compared to most of the population in brain power. You are obviously highly educated. World events you're pretty good on. But I don't seem to ever recall you getting into any hardcore tech stuff. Maybe it's just my old poor memory. You may apparently know everything because you can Google and read and quickly pick up stuff in multiple languages. Just like millions of other people. This is nothing special. But what have you actually done?

Oh, and concerning previous posts concerning toying with an opponent for the onlookers and the opponent just being collateral damage. Nope. This isn't a discussion about an event that someone disagrees on. This is a direct attack on identity. Your signature. Oh flame Master, feel free to move this to flames.

But tell me one more thing before we do. If we do. You don't have any history of self-harm, do you?

Concerning the language master statement. You don't really get American English idioms. You read them and you try to figure for context and then you look it up and then you laugh at the Americans. Each of the words in the idiom has synonyms and you have to string them together and figure out which of the correct synonyms to string together and then finally what it all means in context. You have no clue. Then you Google it. You get different definitions, most of them overlapping. But you don't really get it. You don't feel it and you won't use it correctly. You're probably that way in many languages.

You must have a hell of a case of imposter syndrome.

You have no clue how to use the word fuck in American English because it's so common in your language in a different context. It's fun to watch because it's so obvious.

Don't bother telling me you're not trying for American English. You are writing for impact. And your audience is mostly American English.

Just like the way British use cunt and we don't. Their type of dramatic over usage as compared to over here sets them apart. We immediately discount their usage of it and trivialize it because of that. In your case, your usage style removes all impact.

Anytime I see fuck in a headline or multiple strung together in a single post I double-check to see that it's you writing it. And then I go: Oh it's just you. You get a pass on the judgment. "Just" you. We grant that you are writing on the level of a 3-year-old who's just discovered the fuckety-fucks. Please look at me. I'm dying to be looked at. I can say fuck like the big boys.

Hey, American English onlookers: judgment please. Am I wrong?

Anyone who sees that knows you're basically at the language level of our hillbilly moron.

Happy to give further advice to help in your cultural understanding and language usage.

Oh, and yesterday my blood pressure was too low. My new meds overshot. I was running at 85 over 49. I was tired and groggy and on low brain pressure. I can feel when I'm stupid at that moment. Today it's much better. Ramping up nicely. Shall I go on?

I'd bet a few bucks that you are often multilingual in a professional context.

I wonder how many times you've embarrassed yourself without knowing it?

This is like bubble wrap. Pop. Pop.

I love bubble wrap.
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 5, 2024, 11:42:35 AM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 5, 2024, 11:55:02 AM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 5, 2024, 12:02:53 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 5, 2024, 12:05:44 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 11:39:09 AM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 11:45:37 AM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 12:18:36 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 12:23:10 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 12:31:57 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 12:55:39 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 6, 2024, 12:56:16 PM EDT
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 7, 2024, 10:59:08 AM EDT
New I wonder
Did you ever see this? Did you pattern your usage after it?

https://youtu.be/xZkb4TPI-Lo?si=nc2wShX6jgX9GPdf

Not attacking. Trying to understand. I don't recall you ever describing, so I'll just assume based on where you live that you have Viking heritage. Old Norse turned into German. Fuck is based out of German. Your usage makes perfect sense based on your linguistic background.

We were/are a puritanical society over here and certain magic words make us turn our heads. Most of us have learned to use those words sparingly to really slam it in when we use it.

Fuck is the most versatile, as Carlin said. But is not nearly the worst. And it is easily overused and discounted immediately.

Even in the groups where a constant stream of curses are perfectly the norm, when cunt pops up, everyone does a double take.

Is there a specific female in the vicinity that this could have been directed to? If so, prepare to be eviscerated. Did a female hear you use it at all? Here comes the pain unless it's against someone she really hates. And even then it's a bad idea since they will do some sisterhood bonding and come at you twice as hard.

Guys will very rarely use it within conversation amongst themselves. Simply doesn't happen. So when a British person lets off a stream of cuntity cunts it's kind of mind-boggling.
Expand Edited by crazy Sept. 7, 2024, 12:59:41 PM EDT
New And I just did a quick review of static conversation
You agreed with me. You responded harshly to static when he bailed. I was very gentle in that conversation compared to what it could have been.

"This is cheating. You already said they have an advantage, just not very much. You are supporting the cheaters."

And that was enough for me to apologize.

Which then turned into "you failed" from you.

Okay, what kind of bad day were you having that caused you to attack me for that?
     Dojo clusters - (crazy) - (22)
         I'm surprised by the amount of space between rows -NT - (drook) - (1)
             It makes sense - (crazy)
         Made me look... - (Another Scott) - (13)
             Not that I think he'll achieve it - (crazy) - (12)
                 "On the other hand, those factories would be great for making robots." - (drook) - (11)
                     Not at all - (crazy) - (9)
                         Aha, I think I get it. - (CRConrad) - (8)
                             At least attempted - (crazy) - (7)
                                 Later this month, it wll be 10 years that Greg Folkert died. - (a6l6e6x)
                                 Would you quit it with the lying? - (CRConrad) - (5)
                                     Hehe - (crazy) - (4)
                                         Please stop being such a fuckwit. - (CRConrad) - (3)
                                             Nope - (crazy) - (2)
                                                 I wonder - (crazy) - (1)
                                                     And I just did a quick review of static conversation - (crazy)
                     Speaking of manipulation, check out the Lincoln project ads - (crazy)
         And here's where Elon's breaking the law and he doesn't care - (crazy) - (5)
             Really starting, er, continuing to hate that guy. - (malraux)
             He's got a really simple flowchart - (drook)
             Stupid question - (CRConrad) - (2)
                 Money - (pwhysall) - (1)
                     Yeah, that's what I thought too; the question was almost rhetorical. Sad state of the world. :-( -NT - (CRConrad)

We fly with a sort of irrational confidence.
129 ms