IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New Me too (heh): I think I'm quite "progressive" enough, but this is why...
...women have a category of their own in sports in the first place: Anyone who's grown up in a female body can't compete on sheer physiology with anyone who's grown up in a male body.

And I don't much believe in "hormone therapy" or "androgen blockers" either: Sure, that might block the male-type muscle growth *now* -- but these people have a lifetime of male muscle mass building behind them.

I just don't think them competing with biologically base-females can ever be fair.
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New If that's the standard ...
I grew up in this body. There no way I was ever going to be competitive at most sports at the Olympic level. (Archery I could, probably.)

I don't think there's a simple answer to this. I don't think it's right to exclude all trans athletes from sports, but it's also not right for someone living as a man to declare themselves a woman the day of an event to prove a point, as several have done now.
--

Drew
New Sorry to be politically incorect . . .
. . but my position is that women's sports should be open only to cis women.

Does that disadvantage trans women? Yes, but a vast number of people are unable to participate in competitive sports due to physical limitations. Actually most people are.

And are not cis women being unfairly disadvantaged by trans women in these sports?

Of course trans men are disadvantaged at men's sports, but who is complaining about that?

I have no problem whatever with people being trans (in either direction), but there should be limitations in physical sports.

Of course, trans women could be allowed to compete and their scores disregarded, but of course, they would complain of unfair discrimination, while their intent is to have an unfair advantage.
     Transgen athletes, here we go again - (crazy) - (14)
         Me too (heh): I think I'm quite "progressive" enough, but this is why... - (CRConrad) - (2)
             If that's the standard ... - (drook)
             Sorry to be politically incorect . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
         I disliked the implicit transphobia in that article. - (static) - (5)
             Doesn't matter - (crazy) - (3)
                 [reply removed] - (static) - (2)
                     OK, that's you admitting you can't come up with anything because you were wrong. -NT - (CRConrad)
                     That's okay - (crazy)
             I think "a lot" is doing *a lot* of work there. -NT - (CRConrad)
         Re: Tif the clit is longer than 5 inches chances are - (boxley) - (3)
             So 4 in gets them in the women's division? - (crazy) - (1)
                 Re: So 4 in gets them in the women's division? according to clerks II yes -NT - (boxley)
             ...chances are, you are a hyena? -NT - (CRConrad)
         And here's an interesting dangerous tidbit - (crazy)

Iggy Pop in Daisy Dukes.
87 ms