IWETHEY v. 0.3.0 | TODO
1,095 registered users | 0 active users | 0 LpH | Statistics
Login | Create New User
IWETHEY Banner

Welcome to IWETHEY!

New if I understand point 4 correctly
Only three of the four were blown. And Heinrich notes that the one that wasn't was one half of NS2, for which no usage contract is in place.

so no constrained pricing model?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts" – Richard Feynman
New Yes, AIUI.
And NS1 is under a contract that for all I know reads something like "Germany has an exclusive right to get as much gas as it wants through this pipe". So if Germany says "the amount we want is zero", Putler isn't going to sell any gas through NS1 for however long that contract is. But since Germany doesn't have any such deal on NS2, he could well write a contract to pump gas through NS2 to, say, Serbia or Hungary.
--

   Christian R. Conrad
The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything


Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi
New I won't be alive when the docs are released
I seem to recall about 50 years before the archivists can start digging and of course s*** will be hidden. And I don't speak German.

But what do you think? Do you think the US did it?
New Nope. Seems too much risk for too little gain (or none). Why would they?
New To be very sure that they are never turned on again
Whether or not it's worth the risk of the blowback is a calculation that I can't make.

But European and very specifically German dependence on those pipes tilted the world in the last 5 years. One of the few things I ever agreed with Trump on.

So while they were being wound down in theory, the reality is someone could make a decision and flip a switch and all the sudden all the influence is back. I could very easily see someone making a decision to make sure that did not happen again.
New It was probably the Norwegians . . .
. . to make sure they could continue to get a good price for their gas.
New You guys are supposed to be good at blowing shit up. You'd have got all four.
     did america blow the russion pipelines? maybe - (boxley) - (14)
         Maybe not. - (Another Scott) - (1)
             his track record isnt good but that is one way to blow it - (boxley)
         For those of you who speak German... - (CRConrad) - (7)
             if I understand point 4 correctly - (boxley) - (6)
                 Yes, AIUI. - (CRConrad) - (5)
                     I won't be alive when the docs are released - (crazy) - (4)
                         Nope. Seems too much risk for too little gain (or none). Why would they? -NT - (CRConrad) - (3)
                             To be very sure that they are never turned on again - (crazy) - (2)
                                 It was probably the Norwegians . . . - (Andrew Grygus)
                                 You guys are supposed to be good at blowing shit up. You'd have got all four. -NT - (CRConrad)
         "Intelligence Suggests Pro-Ukrainian Group Sabotaged Pipelines, U.S. Officials Say" - (a6l6e6x) - (3)
             need sat diving capabilty and ship/boat support in a heavily patrolled area -NT - (boxley)
             "Suggests" - (Another Scott)
             AIUI (from other src, not read these yet), it all boils down to "Could have been a tiny 'private'... - (CRConrad)

I bumped into a dot.
123 ms