Yep, and by more than you intuitively might think:
Re: Yup, it's bigger
Yep, and by more than you intuitively might think: |
|
|
Shouldn't "True 4K" be 4096 / 2304, to keep the 16*9 ratio (like all the others in the pic)?
3840 / 2160 = 16 / 9 = 4096 / 2304 I mean, if you only care about the absolute maximum measure, then 4096 * 32 is also "True 4K" -- in one dimension... (Also, why the fuck is there an idiotic comma thousands separator in "4,096" when there isn't anywhere else? Annoying as Hell.) -- Christian R. Conrad The Man Who Apparently Still Knows Fucking Everything Mail: Same username as at the top left of this post, at iki.fi |
|
|
No idea
And the comma looks like the "True 4K" part is a post-hoc addition to the original diagram. |
Faking it in 5K
- (pwhysall)
- (6)
- March 27, 2022, 04:53:07 AM EDT
Can you post a screenshot of what it ... Oh
- (drook)
- (5)
- March 27, 2022, 08:36:11 AM EDT
Re: Can you post a screenshot of what it ... Oh
- (pwhysall)
- (4)
- March 27, 2022, 09:24:35 AM EDT
Yup, it's bigger
- (drook)
- (3)
- March 27, 2022, 10:26:56 PM EDT
Re: Yup, it's bigger
- (pwhysall)
- (2)
- March 28, 2022, 01:13:51 AM EDT
Shouldn't "True 4K" be 4096 / 2304, to keep the 16*9 ratio (like all the others in the pic)?
- (CRConrad)
- (1)
- March 29, 2022, 06:57:40 AM EDT
No idea
- (pwhysall)
- March 29, 2022, 08:18:36 AM EDT