The basis of that decision is that corporations are "persons", therefore they should have all the protections of the Fourteenth Amendment. But if they are persons, doesn't a board of directors controlling what that person does without its consent violate the Thirteenth Amendment?
Maybe the ACLU should take on a corporation as a client and assert its rights to protection from involuntary servitude.
Maybe the ACLU should take on a corporation as a client and assert its rights to protection from involuntary servitude.