It's interesting that they identified specific genes that make a differece.

Post #437,705 by a6l6e6x 12/11/20 10:43:35 PM 12/11/20 10:43:35 PM Reply	It's interesting that they identified specific genes that make a differece. But, given that some people are not affected and others are devastated, it's not surprising that genes make the difference. Careful genetic testing could identify the people that do not need the vaccine. But, I suspect that would be more expensive than just vaccinating everyone. Alex "There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that "my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge." -- Isaac Asimov
Post #437,713 by scoenye 12/12/20 3:18:30 PM 12/12/20 3:18:30 PM Reply	Expensive, plus near impossible Half is not willing to be vaccinated, getting tested will probably go over just as well.
Post #437,717 by Ashton 12/12/20 5:46:30 PM 12/12/20 5:46:30 PM Reply	..And because Natural Selection® usually is v. slow--we may not look for relief from the awaiting (salivating?) Doom. Such ones shall as happily trash the planet too, delighting in the WInning! --over Truthiness, Knowledge and just-plain Goodness. And Tesla-owners. Lemmings would understand. (Ya don't need a Puntiff to deduce what has gone-Rong under Kapitalismo--equated to 'wealth'), and Strife beoming the fav form of recreation of the imagination-free. (My choice re silencing the liitle-[i's] ever running loose in the reptile parts of jelloware--the heebie-jeebies?) Punt. Maybe pen a sequel, while watching? Pair o'Dice Lost If money is still extant, send royalties to the folks with flabby upper-lips :-)

Welcome to IWETHEY!